4b11b4

Yes, but periodic audits.

I'd lean similarly, but those regimes you list aren't likely going to be done by accident.

Putting pair programming and TDD in the same box as agentic development (with, as you assume, zero review of the code) seems...

How can people even...

I have just taken this in stride but it has struck me a few times recently that everything I see now.. I basically have to classify it as to be immediately discarded or worth my time to even begin reading, and even if I do continue reading then I still have to be constantly evaluating if a person bothered to struggle with (write) it or not.

Quite frankly this is.. fucking terrible? Even worse, the end of something for humanity..?

There's a dedicated furry toggle? I mean... I've heard of this but, now I feel like I really missed some societal shift in the world.

This reads as some people made up some categories then classified people into them.

FWIW me too now, but because of my old dog. Also I'm possibly about to sign for the guard, so I guess I'll be ok with that 4am wake up.

wait over a year?

What were the design decisions which you have settled on and what did you throw out?

No, we know that when technology (particularly: Internet connected laptops) is introduced into classrooms competency declines. This has been shown to be true internationally

The first half of your first sentence is correct

Yeah, using them for any (most) subjective task is generally incorrect

Probably. Trade-offs is engineering

Ignorance and generally a hater position

Good to see Josh writing, especially after his courses have taken such a hit. He is excellent. As an electrical engineer and also now CS grad and someone who has purchased his courses wanting to be able to work across the entire stack.. yet have also thought "thank god I don't really have to learn css" now (yes, due to increasing model performance).

On that note I may know just enough to be dangerous thanks to Josh (casting spells: e.g. shouldn't we group those in their own container and then within that container shouldn't that be a flex box?). I guess I'm here to say humans are full of contradictions.

Same I just leave 6.1 on Max. Don't touch that dial

That's.. not..

Nevermind! I just went down a rabbit hole on "negative hard feature mining" that has simple origins from early days of object detection and bootstrapping!

I'm sure pangram has to deal with a lot of bullshit to keep retraining on new model output though.

Can someone educate me - does pangram actually work? Why are people acting like this tool is god?

I thought definitively classifying writing was essentially an impossible problem. Of course, we can often smell it, but again, that's not definitive.

ugh

No.. MCP is for actions

this is just a guard on the function definition?

Can you make them all move on repeat for a sine sweep followed by some misc transients

that is a good one re llms

I like this mindset but damn that's a lot of tokens? At what cost? And then to continue to maintain and .. idk.. I suppose it'll work? If the motivation is strong enough and momentum is sustained?

Seems you're... conflating the concepts of spamming people with using a language model to generate code

lol yeah this should just be a pile of elisp

Run as server, agent can run arbitrary elisp

Sit down

Didn't even bother trying it yet