Re:Why Go?
by afavour on Tuesday March 11, 2025 @01:35PM
(#43334975)
That logic gets to the core of what I'm saying: it's "use C# because it's good for C#", not "use C# because it's good for TypeScript".
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why Go?
by whimsicalism on Tuesday March 11, 2025 @01:49PM
(#43335150)
I'm not even really making an argument for C#, more just what it signals for C#. I am not a C# lover (although I also don't really love love Go).
Re:Why Go?
by AnimalMuppet on Tuesday March 11, 2025 @01:49PM
(#43335142)
I think whimsicalism's point may be that, if C# isn't the tool of choice for this port, then that's the death knell of C#. The death knell isn't what kills it; that's the death blow. The death knell is sounded after it's dead. If C# wasn't the choice here, then C# is already dead.
That may be overstating how dead C# is. But I think it is accurate to whimsicalism's point.
That might be their point, but it’s a bad implication for why languages get picked
Re:Why Go?
by mike_hearn on Tuesday March 11, 2025 @05:19PM
(#43337105)
Languages are languages, so having lots of people to communicate with using them is pretty important. Most people don't want to learn Latin.