Re:UK petition to keep Apple data encrypted
by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday March 11, 2025 @06:45PM
(#43337922)
> Instead of petition, people should wake up and vote
Agreed.
“Turnout at the 2024 general election was 59.7%, which was the lowest at a general election since 2001. Turnout was 7.6 percentage points lower than in 2019” [1].
Re:UK petition to keep Apple data encrypted
by oliwarner on Wednesday March 12, 2025 @06:46AM
(#43341795)
They did! They ousted an overtly-corrupt pile of idiots distilled down from a decade of party in-fighting over Brexit and replaced them with a well-meaning pile of idiots. Only time will tell how they do on big picture things.
But I can't vote for someone now. And even if I could, I can't vote for the person you're talking about because none of the constituency candidates talk about data security. And even if there were, would they align with the other things I want? And even if they did, would their party that delivered them a majority in Parliament also think their way or would that be an artefact and lost to party politics?
Telling people to vote better only works if there is a party who is championing the policy, and that they're also not arseholes in other areas.
Re:UK petition to keep Apple data encrypted
by Jigsy on Tuesday March 11, 2025 @03:23PM
(#43336086)
There's actually a solution to this problem which I stumbled on a few days ago.
Obviously we cannot allow backdoors, and people should have their stuff encrypted, and if the UK's authortarian government wants to know what's being said they should do their job and crack the encryption.
So realistically the UK could just make it illegal to use any encryption algorithm other than DES for anything... in the UK anyway.
Re:UK petition to keep Apple data encrypted
by JumpCrisscross on Tuesday March 11, 2025 @06:48PM
(#43337942)
> Has there ever been any petition in the UK
Online petitions are useless for anything beyond harvesting a list of potential donors.
The value in a petition or
protest is in demonstrating commitment. If you’re willing to fill in a paper form and/or show up somewhere inconvenient, you’re might also be willing to phone bank (and petition for) a primary opponent.
Online petitions do none of that. If an issue has lots of online petitions and nothing else, it’s almost a sign that its base is electorally useless.
Re:UK petition to keep Apple data encrypted
by librasteve on Wednesday March 12, 2025 @03:06AM
(#43340592)
I guess I’m in the minority here, but personally I would prefer UK law enforcement to have judge mediated access to encrypted data. Why? Because I’m a law abiding citizen who thinks the police do a good job in general and I want them to be able to keep my kids safe from drugs, my property safe from theft and so on. Sorry that this is unfashionable.
Of course, this will not stop crinimals from using dark web tools and so on - and it will not stop me from using encryption (steganosis anyone?) if I feel like it.
Re:UK petition to keep Apple data encrypted
by dontlaugh on Wednesday March 12, 2025 @04:50AM
(#43341071)
That sort of naiveté is only possible if you’ve never had to interact with the police, especially as a non-white or non-native Brit. Try going to a protest if you’d like to see evidence of this.
“Good” police may be possible, but it’s not what the UK has.
Agreed.
“Turnout at the 2024 general election was 59.7%, which was the lowest at a general election since 2001. Turnout was 7.6 percentage points lower than in 2019” [1].
https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/general-election-2024-t...
Especially in horrible electoral systems like the ones in UK you have to pick the least bad out of 2 options (every vote for third party is wasted).
I also really doubt that conservatives would behave any differently.
But I can't vote for someone now. And even if I could, I can't vote for the person you're talking about because none of the constituency candidates talk about data security. And even if there were, would they align with the other things I want? And even if they did, would their party that delivered them a majority in Parliament also think their way or would that be an artefact and lost to party politics?
Telling people to vote better only works if there is a party who is championing the policy, and that they're also not arseholes in other areas.
Obviously we cannot allow backdoors, and people should have their stuff encrypted, and if the UK's authortarian government wants to know what's being said they should do their job and crack the encryption.
So realistically the UK could just make it illegal to use any encryption algorithm other than DES for anything... in the UK anyway.
It's the equivalent of those door buttons in elevators. "Give them something to do when they're restless."
A slightly cynical take, but accurate none-the-less.
Online petitions are useless for anything beyond harvesting a list of potential donors.
The value in a petition or protest is in demonstrating commitment. If you’re willing to fill in a paper form and/or show up somewhere inconvenient, you’re might also be willing to phone bank (and petition for) a primary opponent.
Online petitions do none of that. If an issue has lots of online petitions and nothing else, it’s almost a sign that its base is electorally useless.
Of course, this will not stop crinimals from using dark web tools and so on - and it will not stop me from using encryption (steganosis anyone?) if I feel like it.
“Good” police may be possible, but it’s not what the UK has.