News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Body Doubling by amfarrell617 on Saturday March 08, 2025 @11:46AM (#43301489)
Yes. Human companionship when accomplishing difficult tasks is for people with ADHD.
Re:Body Doubling by batch12 on Saturday March 08, 2025 @11:51AM (#43301531)
I thought this was about mundane tasks too?
Re:Body Doubling by polairscience on Saturday March 08, 2025 @12:15PM (#43301721)
Are mundane tasks not the most difficult for people with ADHD?
Re:Body Doubling by batch12 on Saturday March 08, 2025 @12:22PM (#43301759)
Not sure where your question is headed. Mine was a reply to the parent which focused on difficult tasks.
Re:Body Doubling by unplug8224 on Saturday March 08, 2025 @01:39PM (#43302366)
People with ADHD experience find it more difficult to choose doing mundane tasks when a more stimulating option is present. Additionally, they are more likely to employ unhealthy coping strategies like avoidance when faced with a chore that is associated with negative emotions. This can cascade into a cycle of feeling like a failure for lack of motivation causing further demotivation. So the difficulty isn't in the task, but in choosing to sit with the task and the associated emotional.
Re:Body Doubling by jrflowers on Saturday March 08, 2025 @12:22PM (#43301756)
I like this post. You are cleverly saying that body doubling does not benefit people with ADHD
Re:Body Doubling by wussboy on Saturday March 08, 2025 @12:26PM (#43301780)
I think it’s more likely they’re saying it benefits everybody
Re:Body Doubling by jrflowers on Saturday March 08, 2025 @03:22PM (#43303193)
My mistake, so they were agreeing that body doubling is for people with ADHD then. Otherwise a less-charitable interpretation would be that GP is saying that using a website to schedule a stranger to watch you do mundane tasks over Zoom —in 2025– is the same thing as human companionship in general, but that would be a kind of strange thing to volunteer online unprompted
Re:Body Doubling by dang on Saturday March 08, 2025 @04:53PM (#43303886)
"Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith."

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html