Re:Macron to open debate on extending French nuclear protect...
by Aloisius on Wednesday March 05, 2025 @08:17PM
(#43275031)
It has been honored by the US and UK.
The only obligations it imposes, besides not attacking Ukraine, is to seek UN Security Council action should Ukraine be nuked. I don't know why people keep trotting it out like it's a comprehensive defense pact.
Re:Macron to open debate on extending French nuclear protect...
by _DeadFred_ on Wednesday March 05, 2025 @11:17PM
(#43276370)
That isn't the American Secretary of States opinion:
https://bsky.app/profile/dittie.bsky.social/post/3lji5yzf5ns...
Nor is the US currently 'honoring it' clear from a direct reading of the langauge:
https://bsky.app/profile/igorsushko.bsky.social/post/3ljnqjm...
Re:Macron to open debate on extending French nuclear protect...
by ssssvd on Wednesday March 05, 2025 @05:24PM
(#43273540)
It had been honoured — or at least not directly violated — for 20 years. And in international affairs, 20 years is "forever."
Between 1918 and 1938, how many treaties were signed, broken, rewritten, and ignored by how many powers?
Re:Macron to open debate on extending French nuclear protect...
by palata on Wednesday March 05, 2025 @05:29PM
(#43273594)
I'll keep that in mind next time I sign a contract: "I commit to honouring it until I don't".
Re:Macron to open debate on extending French nuclear protect...
by _DeadFred_ on Wednesday March 05, 2025 @11:18PM
(#43276376)
Man so many American's about to be relieved they can stop honoring their 30 year mortgagee.
That the US and the UK (and obviously Russia) did not honour, did they?