>Which, at this point, why not just use M4 as a base?
I imagine that making those chips is quite a bit more involved than just taking the files for M3 Max, and copy-pasting them twice into a new project.
I imagine it just takes more time to design/verify/produce them; especially given they're not selling very many of them, so they're probably not super-high-priority projects.
Re:Apple M3 Ultra
by kridsdale1 on Wednesday March 05, 2025 @02:50PM
(#43271396)
Could be that M4 requires a different TSMC fab that is at full production doing iPhones.
Re:Apple M3 Ultra
by operatingthetan on Wednesday March 05, 2025 @02:59PM
(#43271527)
Or they are saving the M4 Ultra name for later on ...
Which, at this point, why not just use M4 as a base?