Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting
by _DeadFred_ on Friday February 28, 2025 @05:39PM
(#43212650)
"How dare you refer to our weapons designed to fight in eastern europe against Russia. We need those weapons in the USA in case we have to.. fight... in eastern europe... against... russia?"
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting
by slt2021 on Friday February 28, 2025 @06:15PM
(#43213076)
US never wanted to fight Russia directly as it would mean nuclear escalation.
US needs somewhat strong Russia as a scarecrow for Europe and everyone else in the world, so that people would join NATO and pay 4% of GDP to the American military industrial complex: Lockheed Raytheon and friends.
The goal is to scare people and force them to shell out dough for overpriced US weapons.
If Russia becomes too weak, there are two risks:
1. Nuclear/Biowarfare proliferation due to instability inside RU
2. Europe won't spend a dime procuring US weapons because Russia would not be a threat anymore
3. China can increase influence in Russia
so American goal is to keep somewhat stable Russia and force EU to shell dough on US weapons. Thats the racket, everything else is a distraction
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting
by 7952 on Friday February 28, 2025 @06:37PM
(#43213342)
What about china as a weapons exporter?
Re:Zelensky leaves White House after angry meeting
by ApolloFortyNine on Saturday March 01, 2025 @01:09AM
(#43216454)
>pay 4% of GDP to the American military industrial complex
The target is 2%, most of NATO doesn't hit it, and there's plenty of European arms manufacturers.