News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:We are the builders by brickfaced on Friday February 21, 2025 @05:20PM (#43133747)
[flagged]
Re:We are the builders by dang on Friday February 21, 2025 @06:05PM (#43134194)
This is an illusion - see https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26148870 - the examples are old now, but the point hasn't changed.

Why this illusion, and how, you may ask? I can tell you why and how! It's because people are far more likely to notice the data points they dislike (https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...). Not only that, but the dislikeables make a stronger impression when you do notice them. This is why people with strong feelings on a topic always feel like the site is going to the dogs—they're unintentionally blotting out half of the data.

---

Edit: here are more recent examples in case helpful (what can I say, it's a hobby)

The HN crowd is far right - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41370117

libertarian tech bro site - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41674836

a haven for alt-right trolls and hateful abusers - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41799329

HN has also been taken over by fascists - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42059688

techno-libertarian pseudo-intellectual fascists - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42393303

HN has gone way to the authoritarian right - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42066014

tows the line when it comes to techno-fascism - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42781203

Hacker News is pretty much far right when it comes to politics - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42618465

I've got just as many pointing the other way, of course, but the valuable examples point opposite to the illusion. That is, if I were replying to one of these (^^^^) commenters, I'd point them to your post instead!

See also

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=13110004 (Dec 2016)

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25391526 (Dec 2020)

https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

Re:We are the builders by brickfaced on Friday February 21, 2025 @11:45PM (#43136198)
It's not an illusion. I've been on HN across various accounts for over a decade. There is a hard liberal-progressive tilt to comments and post flagging which has been documented and remarked upon by others on sites where such comments don't get flagged and removed. Your own bias is also quite obvious, as is that of pg, who is now known on Twitter as a block-happy liberal lolcow. But thanks for posting all that, I'm glad Bolsheviks seething at Mensheviks haven't escaped your attention.
Re:We are the builders by dang on Saturday February 22, 2025 @12:48AM (#43136430)
I still think my explanation is more convincing, but perhaps that's just me.

I'm curious why you asked "when did HN become this" if you're now telling us that it's been "this" for over a decade.

> which has been documented and remarked upon by others on sites

You should supply links so readers can make up their own minds about how convincing this documentation is.

Re:We are the builders by brickfaced on Saturday February 22, 2025 @08:20PM (#43145229)
Re:We are the builders by dang on Sunday February 23, 2025 @01:51PM (#43151942)
I wouldn't call this documentation in the sense that I thought you meant the word.

These are examples of users complaining about HN in the way many users always complain about HN. You'll find countless such comments making general claims about how the site is "all X" or "has become Y" or "never allows any Z".

The problem is that these perceptions are not reliable—people base them on datapoints that they happen to notice because they dislike them so much [1], and from there they jump to general conclusions.

[1] https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=all&page=0&prefix=true&que...

Re:We are the builders by brickfaced on Friday February 28, 2025 @04:13PM (#43211051)
I'm willing to believe you mean what you say and are posting in good faith, but please read this comment and others on its link and tell me with a straight face there's no strong lib-left bias in HN's community moderation:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43209997

Re:We are the builders by robin_reala on Friday February 21, 2025 @05:22PM (#43133771)
When the right shifted the Overton window to include full-blown authoritarian fascism.
Re:We are the builders by brickfaced on Friday February 21, 2025 @05:24PM (#43133790)
Yes, I and others on the right support full-blown authoritarian fascist positions like "freedom of speech"
Re:We are the builders by scottLobster on Friday February 21, 2025 @05:33PM (#43133871)
You mean like this freedom of speech? https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2025/02/elon-musk-to-fix...

You and others on the right, as a group in 2025, only argue for freedom of speech when it suits you. Yes, the left does this too, and it's just as despicable.

Re:We are the builders by pineaux on Friday February 21, 2025 @05:22PM (#43133768)
Explain to me in English why that statement is a progressive left statement.
Re:We are the builders by brickfaced on Friday February 21, 2025 @05:23PM (#43133780)
[flagged]
Re:We are the builders by dang on Friday February 21, 2025 @06:02PM (#43134173)
Could you please stop posting unsubstantive comments and flamebait? It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.

Re:We are the builders by pineaux on Friday February 21, 2025 @05:27PM (#43133818)
[flagged]
Re:We are the builders by dang on Friday February 21, 2025 @06:03PM (#43134177)
Could you also please stop posting unsubstantive comments and flamebait? It's not what this site is for, and destroys what it is for.

If you wouldn't mind reviewing https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html and taking the intended spirit of the site more to heart, we'd be grateful.