So, in addition to the hit from culling chickens last year, paying for the vaccine, the big producers will see their income tank way more on average than if they just culled a few states worth of chickens and then sold the remaining at market rates.
On the other hand, this action should lower the price of eggs in the US, and makes it less likely that Trump will have to deal with pro-vaccine folks that don’t want their loved ones to needlessly die. I’m guessing they don’t want to distract their propaganda machine by making it explain that everything is great again, and your personal experience with flu deaths is an outlier.
Also, it will help further isolate the US economy, which should reduce the economic shock if Trump follows through with his plan to launch a four front invasion of Canada, Greenland, Panama and Gaza.
I’m hoping the “they did it so less people will die” theory is correct, to be clear.
The risk and impact to domesticated flocks is increased due to the sheer density of modern poultry operations.
“Overall, the excess death rate for Republican voters was 2.8 percentage points, or 15%, higher than the excess death rate for Democratic voters (95% prediction interval [PI], 1.6-3.7 percentage points). After May 1, 2021, when vaccines were available to all adults, the excess death rate gap between Republican and Democratic voters widened from −0.9 percentage point (95% PI, −2.5 to 0.3 percentage points) to 7.7 percentage points (95% PI, 6.0-9.3 percentage points) in the adjusted analysis; the excess death rate among Republican voters was 43% higher than the excess death rate among Democratic voters. The gap in excess death rates between Republican and Democratic voters was larger in counties with lower vaccination rates and was primarily noted in voters residing in Ohio [1].
Somewhat morbid, but one more pandemic would probably permanently shift some swing states’ partisan balances.
[1] https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamainternalmedicine/fullar...
The number of chickens killed by bird flu is miniscule compared to the amount that have been culled by hyperventilation bureaucrats. Chickens have survived thousands of years without being rendered extinct by a virus, that's not going to suddenly change, because that's how evolutionary dynamics work.
So around the same time as the Spanish flu pandemic?
Chickens have survived for thousands of years, but not in quantities and conditions that we cultivate them in today to feed ourselves.
Sure, in an environment that’s completely different from an industrial farming operation.
If they didn’t cull our poultry industry—as a whole—would be ineligible for export to most countries.
If you think about it, veterinarians are a evolutionary adaptation as well!
Edit: stetrain phrased it better :)
In my country, if any factory farm is hit by any virus, the meat is considered tainted and cannot be sold (wouldn't be bought by big retailers anyway) until the virus is cleared.
For poultry it can means 3 months of throwing eggs away. It's more economical to kill all the chickens and start from scratch. If the contamination reach your neighbours, they will do the same thing (so you want to do it early, and radically).
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marek's_disease
Current strains are hitting 100% mortality rates in unvaccinated chickens, and it can spread over a mile on the wind. Wild turkeys are asymptomatic carriers.
There might be more chickens in one mega-farm than there used to be in the wild in their original homeland in Southeast Asia.
Currently you're just parroting conspiratorial disinformation.
I did a web search for you (it's not difficult, you should try it one day) and this came up: