News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:White Hat Hackers Expose Iridium Satellite Security Flaws by glitchc on Thursday February 13, 2025 @01:03PM (#43039104)
Starlink ate Iridium's lunch. Any benefits Iridium was supposed to provide are currently achieved by Starlink.
Re:White Hat Hackers Expose Iridium Satellite Security Flaws by moolcool on Thursday February 13, 2025 @01:10PM (#43039192)
Maybe specialty hardware? Are there handsets yet which can connect to starlink?
Re:White Hat Hackers Expose Iridium Satellite Security Flaws by albroland on Thursday February 13, 2025 @01:14PM (#43039250)
iPhone, most notably.
Re:White Hat Hackers Expose Iridium Satellite Security Flaws by windexh8er on Thursday February 13, 2025 @03:13PM (#43040708)
Much more than iPhone. From Tmobile's FAQ [0]:

Apple iPhone 14 and later (including Plus, Pro & Pro Max), Google Pixel 9 (including Pro, Pro Fold, & Pro XL), Motorola 2024 and later (including razr, razr+, edge and g series), Samsung Galaxy A14, A15, A16, A35, A53, A54, Samsung Galaxy S21 and later (including Plus, Ultra and Fan Edition), Samsung Galaxy X Cover6 Pro, Samsung Galaxy Z Flip3 and later, Samsung Galaxy Z Fold3 and later and REVVL 7 (including Pro)

[0] https://www.t-mobile.com/coverage/satellite-phone-service?ic...

Re:White Hat Hackers Expose Iridium Satellite Security Flaws by moolcool on Thursday February 13, 2025 @01:31PM (#43039438)
Starlink Direct to Cell is not available yet
Re:White Hat Hackers Expose Iridium Satellite Security Flaws by flutas on Thursday February 13, 2025 @01:34PM (#43039463)
I have it on my Pixel 9 Pro XL right now and have had it since the end of January. Worked well so far for me in the country where Tmo typically has had dead spots, if not a little slow.

https://i.imgur.com/wrl5KLf.png

Re:White Hat Hackers Expose Iridium Satellite Security Flaws by moolcool on Thursday February 13, 2025 @01:38PM (#43039515)
That is just texting though, not voice or data.
Re:White Hat Hackers Expose Iridium Satellite Security Flaws by schiffern on Thursday February 13, 2025 @02:08PM (#43039903)
Let's not move goalposts. It's still undeniably both "Starlink" and "Direct To Cell," so I would say that Starlink Direct To Cell is indeed available.
Re:White Hat Hackers Expose Iridium Satellite Security Flaws by moolcool on Thursday February 13, 2025 @02:56PM (#43040506)
Moving the goalposts? The point I was refuting was "Any benefits Iridium was supposed to provide are currently achieved by Starlink", but Iridium offers services today which StarLink does not.
Re:White Hat Hackers Expose Iridium Satellite Security Flaws by keyme on Thursday February 13, 2025 @01:42PM (#43039570)
Is it 5G only or does LTE also work?
Re:White Hat Hackers Expose Iridium Satellite Security Flaws by jandrese on Thursday February 13, 2025 @03:08PM (#43040651)
It's only for texting so it doesn't really matter. That said Iridium is so slow it's mostly only useful for texting type situations as well. Even the voice is so heavily compressed and laggy as to be mildly unpleasant to use.