News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:US and UK refuse to sign AI safety declaration at summit by ryanackley on Wednesday February 12, 2025 @01:25PM (#43028172)
Half moat-building, half marketing. The need for "safety" implies some awesome power.

Don't get me wrong, they are impressive. I can see LLM's eventually enabling people to be 10x more productive in jobs that interact with a computer all day.

Re:US and UK refuse to sign AI safety declaration at summit by bombcar on Wednesday February 12, 2025 @01:54PM (#43028467)
> The need for "safety" implies some awesome power.

This is a big part of it, and you can get others to do it for you.

It's like the drain cleaner sold in an extra bag. Obviously it must be the best, it's so scary they have to put it in a bag!

Re:US and UK refuse to sign AI safety declaration at summit by r00fus on Wednesday February 12, 2025 @01:56PM (#43028485)
So it's a tool like the internal combustion engine, or the moveable typeset. Game-changing technology that may alter society but not dangerous like nukes.
Re:US and UK refuse to sign AI safety declaration at summit by timewizard on Wednesday February 12, 2025 @02:01PM (#43028532)
> eventually enabling people to be 10x more productive in jobs that interact with a computer all day.

I doubt this. Productivity is gained through experience and expertise. If you don't know what you don't know than the LLM is perfectly useless to you.

Re:US and UK refuse to sign AI safety declaration at summit by ksynwa on Thursday February 13, 2025 @02:35AM (#43033585)
Are you not alarmed by the startling discoveries made by the hard-at-work researchers where LLMs lie (when explicitly told to) and copy their source files (when explicitly told to)?