News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:I'm Done with Ubuntu by Beijinger on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @10:14AM (#42949590)
I can't live without apt-get.

I use Bodhi Linux but, besides the Desktop, this is bascially Ubuntu.

Re:I'm Done with Ubuntu by bombcar on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @11:55AM (#42951392)
Is it specifically apt-get that you can't live without, or the concept of a package repository in general?

I'm more and more disappointed that packages are snaps and not directly installed via apt, myself.

Re:I'm Done with Ubuntu by Beijinger on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @05:34PM (#42956318)
I never really liked the RPM system.
Re:I'm Done with Ubuntu by germandiago on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @10:15AM (#42949606)
When you bith say apt-get you also mean apt without "get" or there are major differences?
Re:I'm Done with Ubuntu by hackyhacky on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @10:20AM (#42949694)
Speaking for myself: both apt and apt-get are different frontends to the same package management system and repository, which is shared by Debian, Ubuntu, Mint, and other Debian-based distros. I like the package management system; which frontend one uses (apt, apt-get, aptitude, nala, etc) is of secondary importance, as they differ only in user interface and aesthetics.
Re:I'm Done with Ubuntu by summermusic on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @11:24AM (#42950813)
Linux Mint recently poured a lot of effort into modernizing and streamlining APT dependencies on their distro and it's great work[0]

[0] https://developer.linuxmint.com/rel_xia_whatsnew.php

Re:I'm Done with Ubuntu by kevin_thibedeau on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @10:57AM (#42950353)
They are frontends to dpkg but with their own special behaviors layered on top that aren't identical.
Re:I'm Done with Ubuntu by stonemetal12 on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @10:24AM (#42949767)
The sells pitch for apt is "Apt is a newer, more user-friendly version of apt-get." Apt has been around for 10 years at this point, so if they haven't switched they probably aren't going to.

The primary difference between apt and apt-get is apt has better dependency resolution and apt cleans up after itself when you do upgrades (it uninstalls packages that are no longer used).

Re:I'm Done with Ubuntu by Delk on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @12:21PM (#42951896)
The apt command also merges functionality from apt-get and apt-cache.

With apt you don't have to use two separate tools to search for packages to install them. That's probably at least a moderate usability improvement for many people since you don't have to figure out whether you need to use apt-get or apt-cache for some particular command.

Re:I'm Done with Ubuntu by mplewis9z on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @10:22AM (#42949718)
`apt` (the program) is a relatively recent addition to the APT (Advanced Package Tool) ecosystem - until not that long ago, `apt-get` was the way to install packages, and `apt` is now a "cleaner" way of interacting with APT.
Re:I'm Done with Ubuntu by cess11 on Wednesday February 05, 2025 @10:20AM (#42949676)
I think they mean the repos. I wouldn't be surprised if apt-get is usually an alias for apt, but I don't know, I just type in apt and what I want to do.

On a server we use nala instead, it's quite nice actually, so maybe I'll start using it elsewhere too.