News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re: by potsandpans on Monday February 03, 2025 @08:30PM (#42926245)
Could someone please cite for me in plain english what has transpired in the last 48 hours?
Re: by throw310822 on Monday February 03, 2025 @08:36PM (#42926323)
Also shutting down of federal agencies without Congress approval and getting access to their data:

"Musk on the call also appeared to claim credit for the shutdown of the U.S. Agency for International Development ... though the executive branch’s legal authority to do so without congressional action is highly in doubt, as the agency’s existence is established in law. Trump on Monday said he didn’t need an act of Congress to shut down USAID.

USAID’s homepage has been shut down for days, as is its X account. Dozens of career staff at the agency have been put on leave, and hundreds have been shut out of agency computer systems. Musk aides have gained access to classified USAID information over the objection of agency security personnel, who were subsequently placed on leave, The Associated Press reported."

Re: by walterbell on Monday February 03, 2025 @09:01PM (#42926580)
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/02/03/rubio-acting-head-u...

> The Trump administration took a variety of steps Monday.. The most dramatic was naming Secretary of State Marco Rubio as acting administrator of USAID.. The State Department said in its statement announcing Rubio’s acting role that he has also informed Congress that “a review of USAID’s foreign assistance activities is underway with an eye towards potential reorganization.” .. Rubio explained he was entrusting the duties of deputy administrator to Peter Marocco, the head of the State Department’s office of foreign assistance.. Marocco is also leading the review into USAID activities.

State Department tweet: https://nitter.net/statedept/status/1886512412863684802 or https://xcancel.com/statedept/status/1886512412863684802

Re: by readthenotes1 on Tuesday February 04, 2025 @12:26AM (#42928391)
USAID wasn't shut down. Hot anything else?
Re: by cf100clunk on Monday February 03, 2025 @09:21PM (#42926826)
Re: by binary_slinger on Monday February 03, 2025 @10:22PM (#42927415)
Trump and his colleagues are trying to reduce spending by cutting payments to things deemed unnecessary. Some feel the process in which they do this is questionable and opaque.
Re: by hackyhacky on Tuesday February 04, 2025 @01:31AM (#42928823)
> Trump and his colleagues are trying to reduce spending by cutting payments to things deemed unnecessary. Some feel the process in which they do this is questionable and opaque.

That's not quite accurate. I would say: "some feel the process in which they do this is unconstitutional as the executive branch does not have the authority to dissolve programs." And furthermore: "some feel entrusting these vital government functions to an un-vetted non-employee with no oversight will lead to abuse and conflicts of interest."

[dead]
Re: by bckr on Monday February 03, 2025 @08:34PM (#42926293)
Wikipedia says he’s a citizen.
Re: by epicureanideal on Monday February 03, 2025 @08:38PM (#42926337)
Isn’t the President able to appoint people to do these things? It’s not clear to me this is not permitted.
Re: by yibg on Monday February 03, 2025 @08:40PM (#42926362)
Does the president have authority shut down USAID?
Re: by dole on Monday February 03, 2025 @08:46PM (#42926417)
Can President Trump Dissolve USAID by Executive Order?

According to Just Security, Trump can drastically curtail USAID with executive actions alone; however, he “may not unilaterally override” a statute by executive order. USAID was established by statute as its own agency via Congress in 1998 after first being created by executive order in 1961 by President John F. Kennedy. Since an act of Congress established it as an independent agency, an act of Congress would be necessary to dissolve it. - Forbes

Re: by __d on Monday February 03, 2025 @08:59PM (#42926557)
As with many such things, the letter of the law doesn't anticipate a determined effort to undermine it.

Could the USAID agency could continue to exist, on paper, with a single staff member?

Re: by walterbell on Monday February 03, 2025 @09:10PM (#42926688)
Statements today to Congress and public, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42926580
Re: by searke on Monday February 03, 2025 @08:41PM (#42926369)
tl;dr No. If this were permitted, then a president would just be a dictator.

And he didn't even appoint Musk. Musk isn't head of any government department. He's just a random guy who has a ton of money.

Re: by Mountain_Skies on Monday February 03, 2025 @08:47PM (#42926435)
>unelected

Almost everyone in the government is unelected.

Re: by quinncom on Tuesday February 04, 2025 @07:09PM (#42941310)
Matt Kiser’s WTFJHT delivers useful daily summaries of all significant actions out of the White House. Here’s yesterday’s edition: https://whatthefuckjusthappenedtoday.com/2025/02/03/day-1476...