News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefully removed ". Parent comment

Re:Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefull... by akmarinov on Saturday February 01, 2025 @05:42PM (#42903221)
The ones that didn’t vote are ok with what the voters choose, otherwise they would’ve voted
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefull... by DFHippie on Saturday February 01, 2025 @06:10PM (#42903498)
They're okay the way a patient in a coma is okay with whatever the doctor does.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefull... by khazhoux on Saturday February 01, 2025 @06:21PM (#42903608)
I'm sorry, but how many non-voters were physically unable to vote? My heart goes out to them. But everyone else, who chose to stay home, chose to let others speak for them.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefull... by Terr_ on Saturday February 01, 2025 @06:11PM (#42903507)
"Spoke clearly that they wanted $X" != "Didn't take the opportunity to express any opinion."

Those are fundamentally different.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Phyllis Fong, who was investigating Neuralink, "forcefull... by akmarinov on Monday February 03, 2025 @03:34AM (#42916156)
By deciding not to vote, you’re actively saying that either option is fine. So you’re ok with the outcome.
[ Parent | on HN ]