Re:Open source alternative to Postman / Insomnia
by Chris2048 on Saturday February 01, 2025 @08:12AM
(#42898035)
Are there non-binary versions of Bruno?
Re:Open source alternative to Postman / Insomnia
by natebc on Saturday February 01, 2025 @09:19AM
(#42898463)
https://github.com/usebruno/bruno has the source code. It's a node app so i guess by binary you mean a way to run it without the normal electron wrapper? You should be able to run it standalone though i've never tried it outside it's normal distribution method.
Re:Open source alternative to Postman / Insomnia
by JTyQZSnP3cQGa8B on Saturday February 01, 2025 @08:21AM
(#42898089)
Bruno was supposed to free us from the other bad guy, then they added a subscription too. Fuck Bruno I guess.
Re:Open source alternative to Postman / Insomnia
by _benj on Saturday February 01, 2025 @09:11AM
(#42898394)
I find this funny from people that make their living from $$ from software! Lol
But apart from that Bruno is open source (MIT), you can fork it and have it anyway you want…
The paid option seems just like the traditional open source model of make software free but offer enterprise support. And given that CTOs tent to want to pay for stuff (postman is terrible nowadays but is still picked and paid for) why would Bruno straight up say no to money?
Re:Open source alternative to Postman / Insomnia
by JTyQZSnP3cQGa8B on Saturday February 01, 2025 @11:05AM
(#42899390)
Open-source is about having the whole stuff, not restrictions on "Embed Bruno into your SDLC with deeper Git integration, automation."
What I do resent is the fact that Bruno was a reaction to shitty restrictions from another application, and they did the same thing a few months/years later.
Re:Open source alternative to Postman / Insomnia
by Letmetest on Monday February 03, 2025 @09:50AM
(#42918719)
I'm not sure how adding a subscription is 'the same thing'. Postman forced all of your data to be stored in their cloud, and held it hostage for $1,000/user/year.
Bruno seems to charge somewhere between 70-130 dollars user/year for unlocking GUI features. The same features are all accessible via the terminal or IDE.
Only thing I don't like about Bruno is that you cannot generate a documentation from your api call tests.