News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by nemomarx on Thursday January 30, 2025 @02:03PM (#42880950)
I believe official tournaments don't allow any form of proxy?

you don't want it causing a complication with prize money or etc if you try to play in a regional tournament and get dqed by this I assume

Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by toast0 on Thursday January 30, 2025 @02:07PM (#42880999)
> I believe official tournaments don't allow any form of proxy?

It doesn't solve the problem, but I thought I saw something about tournaments allowing proxies for a card that's present but in unplayable condition.

Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by doctrgiggles on Thursday January 30, 2025 @02:39PM (#42881362)
The few annual tournaments in Vintage typically do allow players to show up and register their deck is present, then put it away in a travel safe and play with proxies. That's for decks that can easily be worth 50-100k.
Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by paulpauper on Thursday January 30, 2025 @03:14PM (#42881717)
MTG cards are among the best investments of the past 20 years. I think it beats out everything except bitcoin.
Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by myrmi on Thursday January 30, 2025 @03:08PM (#42881665)
I know of no tournament that is run this way - can you name an example?
Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by delecti on Thursday January 30, 2025 @02:13PM (#42881074)
Would an example of that be something like "This is my pretend black lotus, and here's my actual black lotus in this graded plastic box"?
Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by toast0 on Thursday January 30, 2025 @02:21PM (#42881169)
If this is authoritative, I don't think so. It's really for the card got damaged in the current tournament so it's a marked card in a deck, or the card is valid, but only available as a foil which would feel different than other cards unless you were playing a foils only deck.

https://blogs.magicjudges.org/rules/mtr3-4/

Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by plorkyeran on Thursday January 30, 2025 @02:23PM (#42881186)
Originally the rule was specifically for cards damaged during the tournament. If a card was in acceptable condition at the start of the tournament but became marked during play you'd be required to substitute it for a proxy, and then acquire a real replacement before the next tournament.
Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by __loam on Thursday January 30, 2025 @02:24PM (#42881191)
There are unsanctioned events that allow proxies but it can put a store's wpn status at risk. For most competitive tournaments you need real cards, but a lot of competition for legacy and vintage are on mtgo (the old online magic client) now which is much cheaper and has rental services.
Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by laurensr on Thursday January 30, 2025 @02:22PM (#42881180)
Imagine governments allowing money for gold that's present but locked away. And later for gold they don't have!
Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by toast0 on Thursday January 30, 2025 @02:29PM (#42881253)
Bridge tournaments don't require the players to bring their own royal court to hold. Everyone gets to use cards proxying the various kings, provided by the tournament.

MTG tournaments become a test of playing skill, deck building skill, and the skill to have enough money to buy important limited production cards. It is what it is, but sometimes it feels gross.

Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by josephcsible on Thursday January 30, 2025 @02:05PM (#42880969)
> I believe official tournaments don't allow any form of proxy?

Is there a legitimate reason not to, or is it just a money grab?

Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by nemomarx on Thursday January 30, 2025 @02:07PM (#42881000)
"official" means run by wizards of the Coast, so essentially the money grab. I suppose it has some benefits in terms of not getting anyone who's swapping cards there overpaying for a reproduction too.
Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by Ekaros on Thursday January 30, 2025 @02:37PM (#42881345)
Basically two things are driving after market value. Use in tournaments and collectability. And after market value drives the demand for sealed product(one directly from Hasbro via distributors and then stores).

I really don't understand why no legislation is targeting this market that is exactly like loot boxes.

Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by FanaHOVA on Thursday January 30, 2025 @02:41PM (#42881378)
Where do you think prize support for tournaments would come from if no one had to buy the cards?
Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by josephcsible on Thursday January 30, 2025 @02:50PM (#42881464)
Entry fees?
Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by kadoban on Thursday January 30, 2025 @03:06PM (#42881645)
And sponsorships, and vendors and etc.

There's tournaments for _all kinds_ of games that don't require loot-box purchases to compete, it's not exactly an unknown problem.

Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by FanaHOVA on Thursday January 30, 2025 @07:06PM (#42883525)
The Mtg Pro Tour is free of entry and has a $500,000 prize pool. Tournaments encourage people to buy cards.
Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by kadoban on Thursday January 30, 2025 @10:44PM (#42884526)
And all it requires is a gross, exploitative business model and lots of grief.
Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by tshaddox on Thursday January 30, 2025 @02:15PM (#42881101)
Is there a legitimate reason for collectors to value an authentic card more than a counterfeit card?
Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by nemomarx on Thursday January 30, 2025 @03:34PM (#42881908)
well if you're collecting something, it's age kinda matters?

maybe a counterfeit that's also from the 90s would have a similarly interesting story, but one from last week is much less interesting than the possibility of a beta card from the first set of a game inherently, and so less collectible.

Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by thaumasiotes on Thursday January 30, 2025 @02:09PM (#42881023)
There's no reason not to allow them. You might legitimately prohibit them if unsleeved, but in sleeves there's no difference. Tournaments that aren't run by WotC do allow proxies, though I think Star City Games limits you to 5 proxies, which isn't enough to solve any budget problems. Again, obviously, there's no reason as far as gameplay goes. SCG does traffic in used cards.
Re:Many of the Pokemon playtest cards were likely printed in... by sleepybrett on Thursday January 30, 2025 @02:18PM (#42881121)
The guys who run tourneys are also often guys that participate in the secondary market heavily. Having an 'open to any proxy' tournament would screw their bottom line. The whole point of them running tourneys is to keep excitement in the game and sell more cards on the secondary market.