AI models don't assume anything. AI models are just statistical tools. Their data is prepared by humans, who aren't morons. What is it with these super-ignorant AI critiques popping up everywhere?

There’s so much data required for training it’d be surprising humans look at even a small subset of it at all. They need different statistical tools to clean it up. That’s where attacks will be concentrated, naturally, and this is why synthetic data will overtake real human data, just after ‘there isn’t enough data even if it’s too much already’.

Try a little benefit of the doubt, nuance or colloquialism. Or a bit of all three.