If the president isn't responsible for the out of the ordinary executive orders he imposes, who is responsible for them?

he signed an EO for an outbreak of TB? you must be an ABC News reporter.

Here's the comment that got downvoted:

> For anyone unaware of us government agency structure. CDC is part of the department of health and human services ( HHS ) which has also frozen everything (see the NIH news as well). > Employees have been instructed to pull publications from review, not communicate with state health departments, and cancel long planned trainings. > These decisions will well and truly kill real people.

These are the executive orders we are talking about.

Are you strong enough of a person to address this? Or must you insult people's intelligence by dishonest accusations?

Also, what does ABC have to do with anything?

Basically what you are saying is that me robbing you, and me making economic policy that might lead to increased unemployment which might lead to greater housing or food insecurity which might lead to increases in crime which might lead to you getting robber are indistinguishable.

Adults can differentiate between direct and indirect causal relationships…it is basically the cognitive development definition of adulthood (c.f. Work by Piaget)