Re:Has LLM killed traditional NLP?
by jazzyjackson on Saturday January 18, 2025 @04:14PM
(#42751471)
OP said 2 seconds as if that wasn't an eternity...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
But then they said 250/second when running multiple inference? Again I don't know if their assertions about running multiple inference are correct but why focus on the wrong number instead of addressing the actual claim?
250/s is still nothing when compared to an actual NLP pipeline that takes a few ms per it, because you can parallelize that too.
I know it's hard to understand, but you can achieve a throughput that is a few orders of magnitude higher.