News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Has LLM killed traditional NLP? by jazzyjackson on Saturday January 18, 2025 @04:14PM (#42751471)
OP said 2 seconds as if that wasn't an eternity...
Re:Has LLM killed traditional NLP? by gbnwl on Saturday January 18, 2025 @04:26PM (#42751561)
But then they said 250/second when running multiple inference? Again I don't know if their assertions about running multiple inference are correct but why focus on the wrong number instead of addressing the actual claim?
Re:Has LLM killed traditional NLP? by Vampiero on Sunday January 19, 2025 @07:14AM (#42756373)
250/s is still nothing when compared to an actual NLP pipeline that takes a few ms per it, because you can parallelize that too.

I know it's hard to understand, but you can achieve a throughput that is a few orders of magnitude higher.

Re:Has LLM killed traditional NLP? by EvgeniyZh on Wednesday January 22, 2025 @01:46PM (#42796141)
250/s is few (4) ms per it