News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Has LLM killed traditional NLP? by Vampiero on Sunday January 19, 2025 @07:14AM (#42756373)
250/s is still nothing when compared to an actual NLP pipeline that takes a few ms per it, because you can parallelize that too.

I know it's hard to understand, but you can achieve a throughput that is a few orders of magnitude higher.

Re:Has LLM killed traditional NLP? by EvgeniyZh on Wednesday January 22, 2025 @01:46PM (#42796141)
250/s is few (4) ms per it