But here you go anyway: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_Typhoon
Google it yourself, if you're actually interested. It's fascinating.
Totally untrue. It was also confirmed by officials from affected companies as well as Cybersecurity monitoring companies. There is quite a bit more detail and substantiation -- even in the Wikipedia article -- than you are acknowledging.
What forensic evidence was published?
Afaicr, it was attributed on the basis of methods. Gmail didn't publicly disclose any internal logging.
And the email chain of custody is unreliable, so post-leak analysis has the can't-spot-a-perfect-forgery problem.
https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/apt... https://www.secureworks.com/research/threat-group-4127-targe...
No such evidence has been published implicating the Chinese government.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Aurora
> On January 12, 2010, Google revealed on its weblog that it had been the victim of a cyber attack. The company said the attack occurred in mid-December and originated from China. Google stated that more than 20 other companies had been attacked; other sources have since cited that more than 34 organizations were targeted.
I am. Google Salt Typhoon.
Please cite your sources. After decades of watching American propaganda, we know all too well that it is trivial to make up shit from thin air and have a large segment of the population eat it up.