News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage for shutdown. Parent comment

Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by bjourne on Friday January 17, 2025 @06:04PM (#42744176)
Yes, what is the point if the cites you have are all based on speculation and vague allegations by US officials? Do you actually have credible evidence that a group affiliated with the Chinese government hacked American ISPs? If not, don't bother.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by stevenAthompson on Friday January 17, 2025 @06:10PM (#42744210)
CISA does. Much of it has been made public.

Google it yourself, if you're actually interested. It's fascinating.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by bjourne on Friday January 17, 2025 @09:40PM (#42745323)
What makes you think I haven't googled it already? Yes, the US CISA agency claims it. But no evidence has been presented.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by herbst on Saturday January 18, 2025 @04:13AM (#42746954)
Even if there were some kind of evidence, the US doesn't actually have a track record on being honest with anything like that.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Supreme Court rules to uphold TikTok ban, setting stage f... by pdabbadabba on Thursday January 23, 2025 @11:49AM (#42805597)
> the cites you have are all based on speculation and vague allegations by US officials

Totally untrue. It was also confirmed by officials from affected companies as well as Cybersecurity monitoring companies. There is quite a bit more detail and substantiation -- even in the Wikipedia article -- than you are acknowledging.

[ Parent | on HN ]