Re:FFmpeg by Example
by th0ma5 on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @08:52PM
(#42706419)
Hate to be that guy, but which model works without fail for any task that ffmpeg can do?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
"Writing working commands first try for every single ffmpeg feature that exists" is the highest bar I've ever heard of, I love it. I'm gonna start listing it as a requirement on job postings. Like an ffmpeg speedrun.
Re:FFmpeg by Example
by MzxgckZtNqX5i on Wednesday January 15, 2025 @03:48AM
(#42708777)
Obligatory xkcd: https://xkcd.com/1168/.
To be fair `tar` is quite easy to use once you understand the grammar of the options.
Yes and every failure of a product turns into a support ticket.
I don't think there's a single human on or outside of this planet that can meet that requirement, but Claude has been pretty good to me. It's certainly a much better starting point than pouring over docs and SO posts.
In my experience you still get a lot of stuff that used to work or stuff that it just makes up.
This doesnt exist in reality so in one sense, you could challenge the relevance
I think in the non LLM world though you at least have the trail of documentation you can unwind once you're in a bind. I don't care for prompt-a-mole fighting.
I know I struggled on getting a good command to “simply” make the videos from my Z8 smaller (in file size).
Usually the color was wrong and I don’t care enough to learn about colorspaces to figure out how to fix it and it’s utterly insane how difficult it is even with LLMs.
Just reencode it as is but a little more lossy. Is that so hard?
Handbrake may be a better option for you. I find that for some tasks it’s not only simpler but straight up works better than FFmpeg.