James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock

Re:James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock by dcrazy on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @02:35AM (#42694728)

I can only surmise you’re referring to Daring Fireball, not James’s blog. You might want to check your monitor’s color calibration (specifically its white point) or brightness setting. DF is and always has been white/light gray on dark gray. Specifically, it’s #fff (body text) or #ddd (blockquotes) on #4a525a.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock by eviks on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @03:15AM (#42694936)

Why do you need any calibration to see that this is an awful color scheme?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock by msk-lywenn on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @04:50AM (#42695509)

Even black on white can be awful with disastrous calibration... white on #4A525A is almost white on black. It looks good on any of my screens and I don't even have that good calibration.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock by eviks on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @05:03AM (#42695584)

there is nothing "almost" about it, #4A525A is ~35 on a 100 lightness scale away from black, "almost" would be 5% or something

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock by dcrazy on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @11:20AM (#42699232)

It’s still within contrast accessibility guidelines. I find it much more pleasing on the eyes than full black on white, which causes a lot of eyestrain on an emissive display like a monitor.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock by eviks on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @11:35AM (#42699579)

Minimum accessibility requirement doesn't define high quality and full black on white isn't the only alternative, so no need to limit your comparison to it

[ Parent | on HN ]