News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock by hulitu on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @01:23AM (#42694337)
> James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock

Looks like a polished copy from CDE.

(The site is horrible. White on light gray. I didn't expected this from a Mac developer).

Re:James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock by throw-away_42 on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @03:57AM (#42695163)
light grey? If 808080 is neutral mid grey, how can 4A525A (32% lightness) be anything but a dark grey? The contrast seems quite readable to me, and seems to pass guidelines: https://coolors.co/contrast-checker/ffffff-4a525a
Re:James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock by eviks on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @05:11AM (#42695640)
Try the actual text color instead of fff (also in quotes, which take up most of the space)
Re:James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock by dcrazy on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @11:15AM (#42699127)
The actual text color is either #fff or #ddd depending on if you’re talking about a blockquote. #fff gets full marks; #ddd gets a “good” rating.
Re:James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock by eviks on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @11:25AM (#42699369)
no, it's #eee for the main text and #ddd for the quotes

And both are slightly above "minimum contrast", nothing good about it despite what the checker sites says

Re:James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock by dcrazy on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @01:00PM (#42701103)
> it’s #eee

I’m going by reading the CSS.

> both are slightly above "minimum contrast"

That’s simply not true.

Re:James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock by eviks on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @01:16PM (#42701390)
Try going by reading the actual page instead, or a web inspector can read CSS rules better than you, linkedlist overrides fff
Re:James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock by dcrazy on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @02:35AM (#42694728)
I can only surmise you’re referring to Daring Fireball, not James’s blog. You might want to check your monitor’s color calibration (specifically its white point) or brightness setting. DF is and always has been white/light gray on dark gray. Specifically, it’s #fff (body text) or #ddd (blockquotes) on #4a525a.
Re:James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock by eviks on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @03:15AM (#42694936)
Why do you need any calibration to see that this is an awful color scheme?
Re:James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock by msk-lywenn on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @04:50AM (#42695509)
Even black on white can be awful with disastrous calibration... white on #4A525A is almost white on black. It looks good on any of my screens and I don't even have that good calibration.
Re:James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock by eviks on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @05:03AM (#42695584)
there is nothing "almost" about it, #4A525A is ~35 on a 100 lightness scale away from black, "almost" would be 5% or something
Re:James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock by dcrazy on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @11:20AM (#42699232)
It’s still within contrast accessibility guidelines. I find it much more pleasing on the eyes than full black on white, which causes a lot of eyestrain on an emissive display like a monitor.
Re:James Thomson on the Origins of the macOS Dock by eviks on Tuesday January 14, 2025 @11:35AM (#42699579)
Minimum accessibility requirement doesn't define high quality and full black on white isn't the only alternative, so no need to limit your comparison to it