The general stance of apologists is to elide contradiction or paradox, or construct elaborate arguments for why they aren't actually there. He more often goes at them head on, and then clearly points out what you need to accept or believe for them to make sense. It's not convincing if you're not looking to be convinced I don't think. But if you are and are just trying to work out the details, well that's why so many christians admire his apologetics.