Re:Does current AI represent a dead end?
by dylan604 on Friday December 27, 2024 @11:44AM
(#42523642)
> radio talk show
Well, there's the first problem.
> were most happy about was how it had now learned
on tomorrow's episode, those same hosts learn that once their chat session ended, the same conversion gets to start all over from the beginning.
Re:Does current AI represent a dead end?
by ithkuil on Friday December 27, 2024 @12:55PM
(#42524346)
Ironically if you explain to those talk show hosts how they are wrong about how ChatGPT learns (or doesn't learn) and use all the right arguments and proofs so that they finally concede, chances are that they too won't quite learn from that and keep repeating their previous bias next time.
To you & I that's true. But especially for the masses that's not true. It seems like at least once to day that I either talk to someone or hear someone via tv/radio/etc who does not understand this.
An example that amused me recently was a radio talk show host who had a long segment describing how he & a colleague had a long argument with ChatGPT to correct a factual inaccuracy about their radio show. And that they finally convinced ChatGPT that they were correct due to their careful use of evidence & reasoning. And the part they were most happy about was how it had now learned, and going forward ChatGPT would not spread these inaccuracies.
That anecdote is how the public at large sees these tools.