News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Ruby 3.4.0. Parent comment

Re:Ruby 3.4.0 by pjmlp on Thursday December 26, 2024 @02:31PM (#42517176)
It is definitely how it works in Python.

As if there is nothing else to chose from regarding Python performance issues and libraries used by folks.

Not everything is fashionable AI.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ruby 3.4.0 by zahlman on Thursday December 26, 2024 @05:44PM (#42518434)
Can you name specific "un-fashionable" AI projects that are dependent on Python code for things that have any significant performance impact, which are seeing significant benefits from Python JIT implementations?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ruby 3.4.0 by cheikhcheikh on Friday December 27, 2024 @09:37AM (#42522354)
He cannot
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ruby 3.4.0 by pjmlp on Friday December 27, 2024 @11:12AM (#42523348)
Microsoft, Facebook, NVidia and Intel apparently can.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ruby 3.4.0 by pjmlp on Friday December 27, 2024 @11:12AM (#42523345)
I guess you will have to ask Microsoft, Facebook, NVidia and Intel why they are bothering then.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ruby 3.4.0 by zahlman on Friday December 27, 2024 @05:32PM (#42526681)
Can you name projects at those companies which meet the description?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Ruby 3.4.0 by nerdponx on Thursday December 26, 2024 @06:04PM (#42518569)
The comment thread was specifically about AI, so my comments were specifically meant for that context. I wasn't clear enough, sorry for the confusion.
[ Parent | on HN ]