Besides, you have fewer choices if your pool of potential friends is rich people.
How many friends does someone need?
I don't see any evidence that wealthy people or upper middle class have any problems friend wise.
Not only that but nothing prevents them from mingling with anyone even a lower "status" if you want to call it that.
About 150: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbars_number
But they don't all have to be real friends. The interesting thing about Dunbar's number is that it also suggests that people strive to make these 150 relationships even when there are not enough people around (i.e. that's why some people care for celebrities and forge online relationships when real life friends are not enough)
Dunbar's number refers to group sizes, not friend counts.
so he could meet people on an equal footing.I did.
He said:
"The right thing to do probably would have been to move far away, live simply, and take up a hobby so he could meet people on an equal footing."
The fact that the above sentence says "live simply" and "take up a hobby" seems to contradict the notion that he should try to take up with people who are equal in wealth which was the issue being discussed.
I said
"live among people"
which is not the same as
"move far away"
and
"live simply"
is not the same as
"make friends with people in the same income bracket or assets or higher"
Why not just live among people and make friends with people in the same income bracket or assets or higher?