Re:Waymo achieves 92% reduction in bodily injury claims comp...
by JumpCrisscross on Friday December 20, 2024 @05:33AM
(#42469875)
> its development still took millions of dollars in R&D
$1mm at the time, $10mm today. They sold for the equivalent of $30 each in today's money and saved manned spaceflight from having to deal with graphite shards in the air and electrical.
> car dependency is not the same as car usage
"If the richest country in the world" got "rid of its car dependency," we'd still want safer cars.
Re:Waymo achieves 92% reduction in bodily injury claims comp...
by rglullis on Friday December 20, 2024 @05:48AM
(#42469981)
> we'd still want safer cars
With the technology controlled by a handful of corporations? At an development cost that will force them to create any and every opportunity to seek rent on your mobility?
Re:Waymo achieves 92% reduction in bodily injury claims comp...
by JumpCrisscross on Friday December 20, 2024 @06:58AM
(#42470373)
Yes, it would be better if the good thing were more perfect.
Re:Waymo achieves 92% reduction in bodily injury claims comp...
by rglullis on Friday December 20, 2024 @07:09AM
(#42470420)
Nice rhetorical trick. It's not a matter of "more perfect".
The bad outweighs the good, plain and simple, and only those who are extremely naive or stand to gain from it refuse to acknowledge it.
Re:Waymo achieves 92% reduction in bodily injury claims comp...
by Dylan16807 on Friday December 20, 2024 @09:47AM
(#42471487)
The bad things you describe as side effects already exist. So adding in good is... good. However you rate the current situation.
Re:Waymo achieves 92% reduction in bodily injury claims comp...
by kube-system on Friday December 20, 2024 @09:21AM
(#42471276)
Isn't that already the status quo?
> Is there a single developed economy that doesn't make significant use of trucks and cars?
For the 127th time: car dependency is not the same as car usage.