Re:Updates to H-1B
by DiggyJohnson on Thursday December 19, 2024 @12:04PM
(#42463432)
I work in the space. You are massively understating the difficulty of finding candidates willing to get a security clearance, and the cost to the company of sponsoring those clearances. It's not as simple as the compensation number alone.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Updates to H-1B
by sneed_chucker on Thursday December 19, 2024 @12:18PM
(#42463575)
Yeah, no surprise. Getting a clearance sucks.
It takes forever and you're subjected to very intrusive scrutiny as well as potentially psychological tomfoolery like polygraphs.
Why would a qualified individual subject themselves to that unless they have no other option.
There's a reason clearance jobs have a reputation as make-work for ex service members.
>You are massively understating the difficulty of finding candidates willing to get a security clearance, and the cost to the company of sponsoring those clearances.
I find this hard to believe. I'd totally get a security clearance, but no company seemingly offers it, they only want people who have a pre-existing clearance.
Re:Updates to H-1B
by DiggyJohnson on Friday December 20, 2024 @09:17AM
(#42471235)
Well that’s the second half of the issue with clearances, they cost the company a fortune to sponsor.
sounds like you have a requirement that filters out a lot of people. typically when things get rarer they get more expensive.
Re:Updates to H-1B
by starspangled on Thursday December 19, 2024 @09:13PM
(#42467658)
> I work in the space. You are massively understating the difficulty of finding candidates willing to get a security clearance, and the cost to the company of sponsoring those clearances. It's not as simple as the compensation number alone.
I don't understand what point you're trying to make. You're saying that a security clearance is a big problem or inconvenience that makes hiring more difficult so salary alone is not comparable... right, but the organization with that big problem is paying less. That's the problem.