News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Updates to H-1B by rgbrenner on Thursday December 19, 2024 @09:31AM (#42461706)
We cannot find qualified applicants. ... [a bunch of requirements] ... No, we don't pay as much as Meta. ... [some more requirements]

The shortage on $5000 ferarris continues as well.

Re:Updates to H-1B by DiggyJohnson on Thursday December 19, 2024 @12:04PM (#42463432)
I work in the space. You are massively understating the difficulty of finding candidates willing to get a security clearance, and the cost to the company of sponsoring those clearances. It's not as simple as the compensation number alone.
Re:Updates to H-1B by sneed_chucker on Thursday December 19, 2024 @12:18PM (#42463575)
Yeah, no surprise. Getting a clearance sucks.

It takes forever and you're subjected to very intrusive scrutiny as well as potentially psychological tomfoolery like polygraphs.

Why would a qualified individual subject themselves to that unless they have no other option.

There's a reason clearance jobs have a reputation as make-work for ex service members.

Re:Updates to H-1B by GenerWork on Thursday December 19, 2024 @01:11PM (#42464166)
>You are massively understating the difficulty of finding candidates willing to get a security clearance, and the cost to the company of sponsoring those clearances.

I find this hard to believe. I'd totally get a security clearance, but no company seemingly offers it, they only want people who have a pre-existing clearance.

Re:Updates to H-1B by DiggyJohnson on Friday December 20, 2024 @09:17AM (#42471235)
Well that’s the second half of the issue with clearances, they cost the company a fortune to sponsor.
Re:Updates to H-1B by rgbrenner on Thursday December 19, 2024 @01:25PM (#42464305)
sounds like you have a requirement that filters out a lot of people. typically when things get rarer they get more expensive.
Re:Updates to H-1B by starspangled on Thursday December 19, 2024 @09:13PM (#42467658)
> I work in the space. You are massively understating the difficulty of finding candidates willing to get a security clearance, and the cost to the company of sponsoring those clearances. It's not as simple as the compensation number alone.

I don't understand what point you're trying to make. You're saying that a security clearance is a big problem or inconvenience that makes hiring more difficult so salary alone is not comparable... right, but the organization with that big problem is paying less. That's the problem.