Gemini 2.0: our new AI model for the agentic era

Re:Gemini 2.0: our new AI model for the agentic era by crazygringo on Wednesday December 11, 2024 @01:26PM (#42390985)

> and Google has been famously bad at getting people aligned and driving in one direction.

To be fair, it's not that they're bad at it -- it's that they generally have an explicit philosophy against it. It's a choice.

Google management doesn't want to "pick winners". It prefers to let multiple products (like messaging apps, famously) compete and let the market decide. According to this way of thinking, you come out ahead in the long run because you increase your chances of having the winning product.

Gemini is a great example of when they do choose to focus on a single strategy, however. Cloud was another great example.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Gemini 2.0: our new AI model for the agentic era by xnx on Wednesday December 11, 2024 @02:18PM (#42391629)

I definitely agree that multiple competing products is a deliberate choice, but it was foolish to pursue it for so long in a space like messaging apps that has network effects.

As a user I always still wish that there were fewer apps with the best features of both. Google's 2(!) apps for AI podcasts being a recent example : https://notebooklm.google.com/ and https://illuminate.google.com/home

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Gemini 2.0: our new AI model for the agentic era by tbarbugli on Wednesday December 11, 2024 @02:40PM (#42391896)

Google is not winning on cloud, AWS is winning and MS gaining ground.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Gemini 2.0: our new AI model for the agentic era by surajrmal on Wednesday December 11, 2024 @03:28PM (#42392560)

Parent didn't claim Google is winning. Only that there is a cohesive push and investment in a single product/platform.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Gemini 2.0: our new AI model for the agentic era by rrdharan on Wednesday December 11, 2024 @04:22PM (#42393118)

That was 2023; more recently Microsoft is losing ground to Google (in 2024).

[ Parent | on HN ]