It just replaces human slop with automated slop. It doesn't automate finding hidden things out just yet, just automates blogspam.
It's actually surprising how many articles on 'respected' news websites have typos. You'd think there would be automated spellcheckers and at least one 'peer review' (probably too much to ask an actual editor to review the article these days...).
AI can handle that sort of writing just fine, readers won't care about the formulaic writing style.
It's actually surprising how many articles on 'respected' news websites have typos.
> I know what I'm doing
Is exactly the key element in being able to use spicy autocomplete. If you don't know what you're doing, it's going to bite you and you won't know it until it's too late. "GPT messed up the contract" is not an argument I would envy anyone presenting in court or to their employer. :)
(I say this mostly from using tools like copilot)
Seems like lawyers could do more faster because they know what they are doing. Experts dont get replaced, they get tools to amplify and extend their expertise
Edit> Its good. Thanks again for ur review.
Just like when software that was coming out, it may have ended jobs.
But it also helped get things done that wouldn't otherwise, or as much.
In this case, equipping a capable lawyer to be 20x is more like an iron man suit, which is OK. If you can get more done, wit less effort, you are still critical to what's needed.
Damnit. It's too good. It just saved me ~6 hours in drafting a complicated and bespoke legal document. Before you ask: I know what I'm doing, and it did a better job in five minutes than I could have done over those six hours. Homework is over. Journalism is over. A large slice of the legal profession is over. For real this time.