Re:PR Process Is Killing Morale and Productivity
by loa_in_ on Friday November 29, 2024 @04:55PM
(#42277454)
LOC is a bad measure of literally anything. It's not related to productivity, efficiency, bug count, readability, etc. What it's most related to is the choice of language and libraries. For me, shunning big contributions just for being big just stifles my drive to contribute. If the solution does what it's supposed to, is valid, efficient and there's no obvious unnecessary duplication of codethen who cares if it's big. All valid contributions push the project forward.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:PR Process Is Killing Morale and Productivity
by sundbry on Saturday November 30, 2024 @12:37AM
(#42279803)
It is actually directly related to the time and complexity of code review. Just because LOC is an imperfect metric for productivity etc., does not mean it's a poor metric for risk, complexity, poor sequencing of changes, or other attributes.