Re:Redis is trying to take over the all of the OSS Redis lib...
by tredre3 on Monday November 25, 2024 @06:44PM
(#42241261)
Use xcancel instead of archive.is and you will see the replies.
Re:Redis is trying to take over the all of the OSS Redis lib...
by toxinu on Monday November 25, 2024 @08:17PM
(#42241710)
Damn it, thank you for the link, sir.
Can we please make this SNS disappear?
Re:Redis is trying to take over the all of the OSS Redis lib...
by jwilk on Tuesday November 26, 2024 @10:00AM
(#42246339)
Isn't xcancel.com a Nitter instance?
Re:Redis is trying to take over the all of the OSS Redis lib...
by wlonkly on Wednesday November 27, 2024 @08:31PM
(#42261528)
It is.
Re:Redis is trying to take over the all of the OSS Redis lib...
by EdwardDiego on Monday November 25, 2024 @07:27PM
(#42241500)
What does it mean by "redis-py" is down? It's still on Pypi?
Re:Redis is trying to take over the all of the OSS Redis lib...
by gurchik on Monday November 25, 2024 @11:40PM
(#42242653)
I think they meant to say the maintainers for redis-py, lettuce, and jedis have already relinquished control to Redis Inc. The libraries are still online, but their repositories have been moved to the official Redis organization and are "controlled" and "owned by Redis" according to an email quoted in the linked Github Issue.
Re:Redis is trying to take over the all of the OSS Redis lib...
by EdwardDiego on Tuesday November 26, 2024 @04:28AM
(#42243998)
Thanks, that makes more sense of the "down" thing.
Re:Redis is trying to take over the all of the OSS Redis lib...
by tveita on Tuesday November 26, 2024 @06:42AM
(#42244840)
I didn't realize Jedis was an official Redis client now, looks like it has been since 2020 without any major impact to the development.
I guess they are unlikely to add any features to support alternative servers.
> Looks like Redis is trying to take over the all the OSS Redis libraries.
> Jedis, Lettuce, and redis-py are down, they are now threatening redis-rs (link in reply).
There's no link in the post, and I don't have a link to the referenced reply, but I'm guessing the link is https://github.com/redis-rs/redis-rs/issues/1419