gurchik
Can you say more? Their Cloud instances, for example, are less than half the cost of OVH's, and less than a fifth of the cost of a comparable AWS EC2 instance.
The student still received a passing grade for the assignment despite some of the assignment being AI hallucinated text. From my experience, plagiarism is an automatic zero for the entire assignment or course, but there are tons of counterexamples when the teacher/professor doesn't want to deal with the academic integrity process.
I am right handed but would ride a skateboard the same way. I never even tried with my left foot forward. Even visualizing it feels wrong. I wonder why this is the apparently uncommon stance? Some people I think prefer to use their dominant foot to push, but it’s easier to keep my balance when my dominant foot is on the board.
It shouldn't be surprising that Novo Nordisk is fighting these compounding pharmacies that are purely interested in undercutting them. Not to say they need our sympathy, since I'm sure a significant cost of Ozempic is due to the injection pen with a million patents.
I’m not sure why it can’t continue to be. Does anyone know why?
https://old.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/1fz4snq/gm_denis_kad...
Not only is the website the de facto platform for online play, some tournaments also use it for in-person games. The site has essentially become a chess authority organization of its own right. Its staff operate as judge, jury, and executioner behind closed doors. While I’m sure the majority of banned accounts were blatantly cheating, their team has apparently taken input from ChatGPT to run “simulations” to determine cheating probabilities.
https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1873ocq/chesscom_c...
Not that my opinion matters, but my preference would be that Matt stops with the pithy comments like "this is a respectful debate" or "I'll try to do better" and is instead just honest that he doesn't care what others think.
Chamber uses SSM Parameter Store, which for many cases is similar, but some people might have a preference for Secrets Manager. For example, a team might like the automatic RDS password rotation for Secrets Manager and decide to put everything there for consistency.
For Doppler, well maybe someone doesn't want to pay for it, or they'd rather control access to their secrets via IAM instead of through a separate tool.
It might prevent you from getting hired at certain companies. I currently work at a company focused on the challenges faced by poor families, and gambling obviously is notorious for disproportionately affecting these families. I was honest with the CEO about why I left (which was in some part due to naivety about the wider impacts the company would have). I got the job without a problem. I'd like to think he was happy for my honesty, but I won't ask him as he's currently on holiday.
Propel is on a mission to empower low-income Americans by simplifying access to government benefits with modern technology. All of our users deserve first-class experiences in their daily interactions with the social safety net and financial services. We're a passionate team of 100 Propellers - all working to help our users get through the month, every month. We’re looking for a self-motivated Platform Engineer to join our Infrastructure Team within the engineering org at Propel.
You will own our fundamental cloud services that our engineering team builds upon, our application platform (based on Kubernetes) that we run our applications on, and own our developer experience and tools.
Tech stack: AWS, Kubernetes, Jenkins, Terraform, Datadog
This position is fully remote, but offices are available in Brooklyn, San Francisco, or Salt Lake City if desired. Location does not affect compensation, but unfortunately we are only accepting applications from residents in specific US states at this time. Please see the job post for the complete details.
How is this possible, when the journalist accessed the data to confirm it contained PII?
Each day I am more and more interpreting "we see no evidence" as "we didn't really look." That way their statement can be technically correct, without divulging any evidence that might be used against them when users sue for damages.
Propel is on a mission to empower low-income Americans by simplifying access to government benefits with modern technology. All of our users deserve first-class experiences in their daily interactions with the social safety net and financial services. We're a passionate team of 100 Propellers - all working to help our users get through the month, every month. We’re looking for a self-motivated Platform Engineer to join our Infrastructure Team within the engineering org at Propel.
You will own our fundamental cloud services that our engineering team builds upon, our application platform (based on Kubernetes) that we run our applications on, and own our developer experience and tools.
Tech stack: AWS, Kubernetes, Jenkins, Terraform, Datadog
This position is fully remote, but offices are available in Brooklyn, San Francisco, or Salt Lake City if desired. Location does not affect compensation, but unfortunately we are only accepting applications from residents in specific US states at this time. Please see the job post for the complete details.
^1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Guy_Macon/Wikipedia_has_C...
Propel is on a mission to empower low-income Americans by simplifying access to government benefits with modern technology. All of our users deserve first-class experiences in their daily interactions with the social safety net and financial services. We're a passionate team of 100 Propellers - all working to help our users get through the month, every month. We’re looking for a self-motivated Platform Engineer to join our Infrastructure Team within the engineering org at Propel.
You will own our fundamental cloud services that our engineering team builds upon, our application platform (based on Kubernetes) that we run our applications on, and own our developer experience and tools.
Tech stack: AWS, Kubernetes, Jenkins, Terraform, Datadog
This position is fully remote, but offices are available in Brooklyn, San Francisco, or Salt Lake City if desired. Location does not affect compensation, but unfortunately we are only accepting applications from US residents at this time.
1: https://techcrunch.com/2020/03/16/yc-ceo-michael-seibel-open...
^1: https://www.rapid7.com/blog/post/2022/06/06/the-hidden-harm-...
^2: https://discourse.metabase.com/t/upgrade-your-metabase-insta...
^3: https://www.jetbrains.com/help/teamcity/teamcity-2023-11-4-r...
^4: https://blog.jetbrains.com/teamcity/2024/03/additional-criti...
This doesn't align with my experience. From what I've seen, the consensus is that the majority of edits from an IP user are constructive, and they're not reverted simply because they're from an IP user. I've seen data about this[1], but for fun I looked at a page I've edited recently. Out of the last 50 edits, 13 were from IP users (26%), and only 4 of them were vandalism (30% of IP edits).
You are right that some people entrench into a "turf" and revert things for no reason. This is an old problem on Wikipedia. But this is pretty rare across the site from my experience. And I have seen people get warnings for this behavior. If someone was reverting simple typo fixes or discussions on a Talk page I would expect something to happen to that user, regardless if it was against an IP user or not.
That's not to say there are no advantages to having an account. Creating new pages, uploading files, and editing semi-protected pages require an account. Some articles require pretty strict criteria to edit, your account has to be at least 30 days old with 500 edits (which is more than I have). This list is around 7000 articles[2] which is more than I expected.
^1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:IP_editors_are_human...
^2: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Protected...
The only reason these guidelines exist is because all articles need to have references. No references, no article. The vast majority of deleted articles don't have any references. If you have just a couple references, that article is likely to float around in some gray area for a long time. There are articles on the site only a couple sentences long, but they have notable references, so they can't easily be deleted.
People mistakenly think that paying off an administrator is a golden ticket to getting on the site. They misunderstand that the majority of governance on the site is done in public, and often doesn't involve administrators at all. For example, I've been involved in a couple requests for article deletion (sometimes as the person requesting the deletion, sometimes not). In all my experiences, no administrator was involved in the debate. If there are good reasons to delete an article, a bribed administrator will simply be outvoted by the public.
^1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability
^2: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources
https://web.archive.org/web/20240131023937/https://www.fda.g...
With that said, it is a shame that in cases like this, you may not even know about a post with hundreds of comments unless someone sends you a link. Have you thought about implementing a view that ignores the flamewar detection? This could even be a historical view, like https://news.ycombinator.com/front?day=2024-01-31 . The post in question was one of the highest upvoted submissions of the day and yet it's not on the first page of this link.
I fully agree with you that in the majority of cases these comments are not encouraging intellectual curiosity, I still do like reading the comments because I do find some interesting stuff there sometimes.