Re:M4 Mac mini's efficiency
by throawayonthe on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @06:19PM
(#42121038)
windows also uses memory compression
Re:M4 Mac mini's efficiency
by FireBeyond on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @10:23PM
(#42122588)
Yeah, that doesn't explain why the Intel Mac Pro cheesegrater wanted $3,000 for 160GB of socketed RAM that OWC would sell from the same manufacturer, same speeds, for $1,000 for 192GB.
Sorry Bob, architecture may be different now, but Apple has always been egregious.
Re:M4 Mac mini's efficiency
by MonkeyClub on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @10:28PM
(#42122611)
But what's the point in Borcher's comment? Because there's efficient software use of memory, it's legitimate to put a tenfold price marker on the hardware?
"Comparing our memory to other system's memory actually isn't equivalent [...] because of the fact that we have such an efficient use of memory, and we use memory compression, and we have a unified memory architecture."
- Bob Borchers, Apple vice president of worldwide product marketing (who apparently never heard of zram)