News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by Xxfireman on Monday November 11, 2024 @12:56AM (#42104832)
Does anyone else miss simple gray GUIs? There is something in my brain that associates that style with “real” computing. I would love to have an editor theme for it (IntelliJ / vs code / terminal.app).
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by bpye on Monday November 11, 2024 @02:05AM (#42105056)
I don’t know if I miss grey UIs, but I do miss the consistent design language and how easy it was to tell if something was a button, scrollable, etc.
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by simonask on Monday November 11, 2024 @03:14AM (#42105347)
Aren't we at a pretty good place with that stuff, though? It's rare to see the abominations that used to roam, especially in the Flash era. Web designers generally follow mostly the same principles and design language. Windows is the only place where it's still a bit wild west.
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by RossBencina on Monday November 11, 2024 @04:14AM (#42105602)
I don't think so. One example: on Windows, vscode changed the behavior of scroll bars -- something that has been a standard since the mid-80s. They changed the paging behavior and removed the end buttons. Unbelievable.
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by simonask on Monday November 11, 2024 @05:35AM (#42106068)
End buttons on scroll bars are a remnant from when scrolling was new. macOS has done away with them entirely. It's been decades since I interacted with one, so no, I don't miss them at all.

So, I'm not denying that the situation on Windows is inconsistent when you factor in UIs that Microsoft is trying desperately to update, but the design language around scrolling in modern UIs just doesn't seem to be a real problem (outside of accessibility, obviously, which needs special attention regardless).

Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by ryandrake on Monday November 11, 2024 @10:52AM (#42108011)
> design language around scrolling in modern UIs just doesn't seem to be a real problem (outside of accessibility, obviously, which needs special attention regardless)

This is another difference between the mentality today vs. the mentality back then. Accessibility should not need "special" attention. It should be baked into the product. Enough users lack the ability to comfortably drag while clicking, that you don't want to first release a product that doesn't work for them, and then later fix it as a bug. You need to consider Accessibility from day one, during the early design. Just like you need to consider security vulnerabilities and user privacy from day one. They're not things that get tacked on at the end.

But this example isn't even about considering Accessibility holistically. The devs just flat out -removed- the scroll end caps from the product! This wasn't an oversight or some UX over-eager designer accidentally going overboard. They deliberately went out of their way to remove a standard control.

Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by RossBencina on Tuesday November 12, 2024 @05:03AM (#42114222)
I don't know about Windows 11, but on Windows 10 end buttons remain standard. Do you also think that diverging from consistency with the host platform is acceptable?
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by Dalewyn on Monday November 11, 2024 @03:42AM (#42105470)
>Aren't we at a pretty good place with that stuff, though?

Hell no:

I can't tell what is and isn't a button.

I can't tell specific areas apart from others (no borders/shading).

I can't see or use the scroll bar, assuming one is even present.

I can't tell where a window begins and ends.

I can't tell which window is active.

I can't tell what a window is for.

I can't tell what the fuck these Nouveautian Hieroglpyhs from Uranus (aka icons) mean.

I could go on, but I digress: Are we in a pretty good place? Hell no.

Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by anthk on Monday November 11, 2024 @04:12AM (#42105598)
I use EMWM and a Motif theme for QT5 because of that. For GTK, a nice one it's 'backwater', good enough. Not Motif, but it blends well.
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by jbverschoor on Monday November 11, 2024 @05:01AM (#42105863)
Check my post a few minutes ago to fix most problems. Also, install HazeOver to dim (or hide) inactive windows/apps.
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by simonask on Monday November 11, 2024 @05:39AM (#42106090)
It's kind of hard to tell how real your problems are without knowing which environment you are talking about, but it would be helpful to know where you have encountered these problems. I haven't seen them in any of the apps or OSes I regularly use (Windows, macOS).

On both Windows and macOS, windows are clearly delimited by drop shadows. You have to go out of your way as a malicious app developer to explicitly disable that.

I haven't interacted with a scrollbar in decades. Its purpose in 2024 is a visual cue.

Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by da_rob on Monday November 11, 2024 @06:49AM (#42106485)
> On both Windows and macOS, windows are clearly delimited by drop shadows.

https://www.threads.net/@roblillack/post/DBYOuivOPFV

Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by Numerlor on Monday November 11, 2024 @08:46AM (#42107062)
Looks like the terminal but can't zoom in on mobile, I guess UsabilityNightmares for threads too
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by da_rob on Monday November 11, 2024 @09:35AM (#42107410)
IIRC it's the Calculator. :(
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by Dalewyn on Monday November 11, 2024 @01:14PM (#42109201)
It's the minimize/maximize/close buttons. Inactive windows draw them ever so slightly in gray compared to active windows drawing them in black. Calculator has them in black.

As for Powershell/Terminal, assuming the screenshot wasn't timed deliberately, there is no caret which implies it's not the active window.

It's shading, but the worst kind of shading.

Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by Numerlor on Monday November 11, 2024 @05:38PM (#42111091)
The new windows GUI framework used for the windows on the screen seems to be worse in this regard, as normal windows get their titles greyed out which is quite obvious and is a more natural place to look at than the control buttons
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by seba_dos1 on Monday November 11, 2024 @07:13AM (#42106602)
Most of those are immediately apparent in at least Windows, macOS and GNOME.
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by Dalewyn on Monday November 11, 2024 @01:05PM (#42109118)
>On both Windows and macOS, windows are clearly delimited by drop shadows.

I disable window shadows with extreme prejudice because I find them visually painful. They obscure something I should be able to see without meaningfully highlighting what I want to see, which instinctively strains my eyes.

What the sincere hell was the problem with a simple, thick window border?

>Its purpose in 2024 is a visual cue.

Yes. They are practically non-existent in most environments.

Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by keyringlight on Monday November 11, 2024 @05:45AM (#42106116)
Going past windows 7 the trend moving from graphical/textured UI chrome to minimalist/hidden elements, scrollbars has been one of the big 'casualties' for me. When it's just a solid gray there's very little to distinguish it from the content, and it doesn't help readability if the bar is meant to show what proportion of the whole document you're viewing. As much as some people hated it, going back further to winxp where they had color in the UI made contrast better again (and you could customize the theme in the win3.x/9x windows), or third party themes if you were prepared to lightly mess with OS files.
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by RGamma on Monday November 11, 2024 @08:41AM (#42107038)
Also: offending Fitts's law and pseudomaximized windows.
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by saw-lau on Monday November 11, 2024 @09:51AM (#42107530)
And on top of all that is the terrible (IMHO) UX design pattern of getting rid of Apply/Cancel buttons, particularly in settings panes.
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by eMPee584 on Monday November 11, 2024 @04:57AM (#42105831)
mobile is an UX / accessibility abyss though xD
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by phendrenad2 on Monday November 11, 2024 @09:46AM (#42107487)
I use Edge as my browser, but I think Chrome is the same: The scrollbar is hidden while I'm not scrolling. There's an option to always show the scrollbar, but it's still this tiny little sliver that doesn't match the system scrollbar.

Someone at Google, and someone else at Microsoft, probably think this is good UX. I beg to differ.

Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by jbverschoor on Monday November 11, 2024 @04:55AM (#42105824)
My settings on macOS (and partly iOS):

Accessibility -> Display:

  - Reduce Motion
  - Increase contrast
  - Differentiate without color
  - Show window title icons
  - Show toolbar button shapes
Appearance:

  - Show scrollbars: always
Keyboard:

  - Keyboard Navigation  (use space, tab, enter)
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by drooopy on Monday November 11, 2024 @03:42AM (#42105476)
I sure do. Modern OS UIs might be visually rich and feature-packed, but this definitely came at the cost of clarity and efficiency. Because I do a lot of writing, I keep an old thinkpad and an old PowerBook running NT 4 and Mac OS 9 respectively. There's just something about those grays and the straightforward, no-nonsense UIs that allows me to work without distractions. I can't say the same thing about my macbook and all of its colorful superfluous features. Of course, since those OSes are ancient, it's more difficult to access the internet which also helps quite a lot with me being more focused on my work.
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by timthorn on Monday November 11, 2024 @03:24AM (#42105395)
> There is something in my brain that associates that style with “real” computing.

That's interesting. For me, it's green or amber terminals - perhaps it's like music where the genre of your teens defines the best music for the rest of your life. Were you a teenager in the Win3.1 era?

Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by com2kid on Monday November 11, 2024 @01:10AM (#42104878)
I use the MS DOS editor theme for VS Code!
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by netsharc on Monday November 11, 2024 @03:45AM (#42105484)
Wow, the edit.com / qbasic.exe UI!

I spent hours in QBasic when I was a teenager. Damn, that's ages ago!

Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by _joel on Monday November 11, 2024 @04:01AM (#42105548)
GORILLA.BAS
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by ta12653421 on Monday November 11, 2024 @05:17AM (#42105966)
this is already advanced LEVEL II for experienced programmes who were able to use Q Basic.

but ... real pro's were using GW Basic! https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GW-BASIC

LOL

Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by litenboll on Monday November 11, 2024 @01:58AM (#42105027)
Not even a little! I can get nostalgic, sure, but I wouldn't want it to be part of my everyday experience.
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by bionsystem on Monday November 11, 2024 @01:15AM (#42104898)
I like to run LXQt sometimes for that (and for the snappiness / low resources).
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by ta12653421 on Monday November 11, 2024 @05:15AM (#42105959)
Ah, yes, "REAL" computing:

in the old days you had to pack your 17inch screen into your car, drive to your friends house, plan to game Doom or Quake, but in the end you were configuring network drivers etc. the whole weekend instead of playing: including features like countless reboots and reinstalls because something was crashed during "optimizing" the memory configuration for whatever driver<->game combo.

and if you set a wrong/not supported screen resolution in NT4, you had to set off power to reboot the computer because resolution back-switching was not available back then.

REAL computing also in the sense that a 500kb wordfile could crash your machine, if it loaded at all - because it took 1 min to load the bytestream from disk :)

yes, good ol days :-D

Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by kchr on Monday November 11, 2024 @05:51AM (#42106148)
While I appreciate the flashbacks you just gave me, I don't think the enshittifaction of GUI:s is orthogonal to the evolution in not having to deal with hardware issues any more.
Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by ta12653421 on Monday November 11, 2024 @07:20AM (#42106637)
well, then we may have a different interpretation of "REAL computing" :-D LOL

but i agree: that we do not have these hardware issues anymore was huge driver in getting mass adoption of home computing & internet and the ecosystem as a whole - i remember 1994 when i needed a graphic driver update for some niche SVGA card, i had to go to the store, give them 4 x 3.5inch disks, wait one week and then i could get the disks back :-D

today, the normal DAU is able to buy a super powerful computer in a discount store and have it running with some games 1h later.

Re:Virtual Windows 3.11 Computer by theandrewbailey on Monday November 11, 2024 @10:48AM (#42107982)
That's a lot of the reason why I use Chicago95 where I can.

https://github.com/grassmunk/Chicago95