News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Is yt-dlp/yt-dlp compromised? by forensicnoob on Monday November 04, 2024 @06:51AM (#42040689)
Look at other tabs https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/3f6ab524d899f39ef46004a9... at the bottom you can see the commands that looks like the program trying to delete down syslogs. Look also in the relations tab that shows some tor nodes.
Re:Is yt-dlp/yt-dlp compromised? by blueflow on Monday November 04, 2024 @06:59AM (#42040733)
This is not "shutting down" rsyslog. The kill command sends a SIGHUP to rsyslog, which causes it to reopen its log files - what you are seeing is a normal logrotation, not an attempt to terminate the process.

I suspect virustotal did the check in a container with a logrotation job still running, and it happened to run right in the moment when yt-dlp was being tested.

Re:Is yt-dlp/yt-dlp compromised? by Faaak on Monday November 04, 2024 @07:03AM (#42040756)
You mean this `systemctl kill -s HUP rsyslog.service` ? This just tells syslog to reload itself
Re:Is yt-dlp/yt-dlp compromised? by FergusArgyll on Monday November 04, 2024 @07:10AM (#42040810)
Why would yt-dlp tell syslog to reload?
Re:Is yt-dlp/yt-dlp compromised? by netsharc on Monday November 04, 2024 @08:06AM (#42041163)
It seems VirusTotal spins up a virtual machine/container to run the program, and monitors what happens inside that environment. And it further seems that during that time syslog (or something else, probably the distribution) reloaded itself. And some other process tried to connect to the TOR IPs.

And since we're all amateurs here who don't understand what VirusTotal is doing, some of us think "ZOMG yt-dlp compromised?!?".

If you look at the process tree, the process that reloaded rsyslog wasn't spawned from the yt-dlp_linux process.

Re:Is yt-dlp/yt-dlp compromised? by viraptor on Monday November 04, 2024 @07:01AM (#42040739)
I don't see anything trying to delete syslogs. There's a line for reloading new configuration (kill -HUP ...) - is that what you meant?