Try having an LLM figure out quaternions as a solution to gimbal locking or the theory of relativity without using any training information that was produced after those ideas were formed, if you need me to spell out examples for you
If you want to continue this conversation I’m willing to do so but you will need to lay out an actual argument for me as to how AI models are actually capable of reasoning or quit it with the faux outrage.
I laid out some reasonings and explicit examples for you in regards to my position, it’s time for you to do the same
Does having this conversation require reasoning abilities? If no, then what are we doing? If yes, then LLMs can reason too.
I'm also fully willing to argue that you, personally are less competent than an LLM if this is the level of logic you are bringing to the conversation
***** highlighting for everyone clutching their pearls to parse the next sentence fragment first ******
and want to use that are proof that humans and LLMs are equivalent at reasoning
******* end pearl clutching highlight *******
, but that doesn't mean I don't humans are capable of more