Before you buy a domain name, first check to see if it's haunted

Re:Before you buy a domain name, first check to see if it's ... by perching_aix on Saturday October 26, 2024 @04:39PM (#41957568)

But in this scenario there are many more parties involved than just "the police". So you can't "just fix the police behavior" for a "solution". You'd have to "fix" any and every party that already exists or pops up in the future.

This kind of issue is inherent to any system where identifiers are recycled, particularly when that recycling happens on demand. It's not "fixable", at best it's combatable. And trying to language police away the symptom and blaming it all on the pivotal participants supports and achieves neither.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Before you buy a domain name, first check to see if it's ... by teddyh on Sunday October 27, 2024 @05:27AM (#41961057)

The analogy is not perfect, but there aren’t myriads of parties, there’s basically only Google, plus a handful of others of greatly decreasing importance.

If it was a reputation problem where, say, end clients with web browsers would each have a separate and uniquely derived negative opinion about domain names, this would indeed be a “bad reputation” problem and not a Google problem, since the problem could not be fixed at the Google side. But with domain reputation being so centralized, the problem is at the center.

[ Parent | on HN ]