Math is still catching up to the genius of Ramanujan

Re:Math is still catching up to the genius of Ramanujan by elgenie on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @03:12AM (#41911943)

Ramanujan himself survived childhood smallpox and died at just 32 from what's thought to be complications from an earlier bout with dysentery. But he had lucked out in that he was born male in an urban setting in a high caste, with access to education, textbooks, and the language of the imperial core, and managed to make it to adulthood at all.

“I am, somehow, less interested in the weight and convolutions of Einstein’s brain than in the near certainty that people of equal talent have lived and died in cotton fields and sweatshops.” ~ Stephen Jay Gould

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Math is still catching up to the genius of Ramanujan by scotty79 on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @06:24AM (#41912902)

If we individual makeup was so irrelevant we wouldn't have just had me Ramanujan so far. Although I agree that Einstein is probably very unremarkable and was mostly the right (genius) person in the right place at the right time in history of science to marry together things other people figured out and sprinkle some unique framing onto that.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Math is still catching up to the genius of Ramanujan by BobaFloutist on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @10:44AM (#41914817)

It's not that individual makeup is so irrelevant, it's that if we assume (potential) Einsteins and Ramanujans follow a normal distribution (or really any random distribution), then the fact that so many people in the world live in situations where any genius will simply never be noticed means we are necessarily missing out on the vast majority of them.

[ Parent | on HN ]