News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:First Images from Euclid Are In by mcmoor on Monday October 21, 2024 @11:06PM (#41910827)
We're multiplying a very large number (number of planets) with a very small number (chance of intelligent life). The margin can make the answer go either way.
Re:First Images from Euclid Are In by colordrops on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @12:15AM (#41911131)
Why do you think the chance of intelligent life is a very small number? Considering we know of several million species, the chances are that we are right in the middle of the curve, and can't recognize the vastly more intelligent species the way an ant can't recognize our intelligence.
Re:First Images from Euclid Are In by mr_mitm on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @07:11AM (#41913138)
How is the number of known species correlated to the probability of life emerging? As far as we know, life emerged only once on earth, and all species evolved from a single common ancestor.
Re:First Images from Euclid Are In by colordrops on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @01:56PM (#41916864)
I'm talking about the chance of intelligent life, not life emerging at all, in response to the comment above.
Re:First Images from Euclid Are In by lnenad on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @02:47AM (#41911830)
You are basing the chance of intelligent life number on what? Reality is we have no clue what this number is.
Re:First Images from Euclid Are In by mr_mitm on Tuesday October 22, 2024 @03:41AM (#41912087)
Exactly, so we shouldn't say things like "no doubt" when it comes to the question of extra terrestrial life.