News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:SSDs cost half of what they did in 2011 by chmars on Sunday July 01, 2012 @05:27AM (#4184293)
Has anyone data on the price development of Apple SSDs?

Since newer Macs doesn't allow for an SSD change, the initial SSD price is very important. I suspect that the fact that you have to max out your SSD on purchase if you want to use your Mac for a longer time, SSDs in Macs have actually become more expensive.

In the past, you could buy a Mac with a small SSD or even a HDD. After one or two years, you could replace your small SSD or your HDD with an up-to-date SSD and could usually benefit from lower storage prices …

Re:SSDs cost half of what they did in 2011 by kalleboo on Sunday July 01, 2012 @09:41AM (#4184692)
OWC sell an upgrade for the Air's SSD, I imagine it's just a matter of time until there's one available for the retina pro http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/SSD/OWC/Aura_Pro_Express
Re:SSDs cost half of what they did in 2011 by Dylan16807 on Sunday July 01, 2012 @11:15AM (#4184964)
Oh, I hadn't realized that even though the ram is soldered on the SSD is on a relatively-easy to remove card. It's the only thing that looks feasible to upgrade.
Re:SSDs cost half of what they did in 2011 by listic on Sunday July 01, 2012 @05:36AM (#4184311)
Which newer Macs do you have in mind?
Re:SSDs cost half of what they did in 2011 by chmars on Sunday July 01, 2012 @11:53AM (#4185098)
MacBook Air and the latest MacBook Pro with Retina display and of course the iMac.

For iMac and MacBook Air, upgrade options are available but they are pricey and non-trivial.

Re:SSDs cost half of what they did in 2011 by lloeki on Sunday July 01, 2012 @07:18AM (#4184420)
I guess latest MacBook Air and Retina MacBook Pro. They're not soldeded on, but the SSD is a specific daughter-board.