News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Routine dental X-rays are not backed by evidence–experts ... by rootusrootus on Monday October 14, 2024 @06:36PM (#41842896)
Yes, flossing cannot be proven to help. But it cannot be proven to hurt, either, so current recommendations are to do it anyway.
Re:Routine dental X-rays are not backed by evidence–experts ... by kart23 on Monday October 14, 2024 @07:09PM (#41843163)
I still floss because I think its gross and I have bad gaps in some of my teeth, but I think flossing can also cause harms, for example some floss has PFAS in it.

https://www.consumerreports.org/toxic-chemicals-substances/d...

Re:Routine dental X-rays are not backed by evidence–experts ... by Supermancho on Monday October 14, 2024 @07:29PM (#41843309)
> Yes, flossing cannot be proven to help.

It's demonstrable that something like a bean skin, lodged in your teeth, will erode the teeth touching it.

Re:Routine dental X-rays are not backed by evidence–experts ... by camgunz on Monday October 14, 2024 @06:49PM (#41843015)
You can say the exact same thing about eating a blank piece of paper twice a day. Pascal's wager is no way to live life.
Re:Routine dental X-rays are not backed by evidence–experts ... by krackers on Monday October 14, 2024 @06:38PM (#41842911)
>cannot be proven to hurt

Inserting floss between your teeth pushes them slightly apart. I wonder if that could have any negatives?

Re:Routine dental X-rays are not backed by evidence–experts ... by bsmith on Monday October 14, 2024 @06:43PM (#41842957)
Considering orthodontic treatments, no. I imagine you could damage the connective tissues under the gums though.
Re:Routine dental X-rays are not backed by evidence–experts ... by Barrin92 on Monday October 14, 2024 @06:52PM (#41843048)
>But it cannot be proven to hurt, either, so current recommendations are to do it anyway.

That's not a meaningful standard for any health intervention. If I'd apply everything to my body that wasn't proven to hurt I'd spend a hundred bucks every morning and two hours in the bathroom. If "it doesn't hurt" was sufficient basis for a recommendation our doctors would tell us to swallow homeopathic medicine every morning.

It seems pretty obvious that anything you apply has to have at least some measurable impact, otherwise you're basically in the same category as the supplement industry.

Re:Routine dental X-rays are not backed by evidence–experts ... by mikedelfino on Tuesday October 15, 2024 @09:32AM (#41848406)
I'm inclined to believe that preventing food particles from rotting between my teeth is a measurable impact in itself, regardless of whether it directly impacts my health.
Re:Routine dental X-rays are not backed by evidence–experts ... by rootusrootus on Tuesday October 15, 2024 @11:06AM (#41849397)
Your assumption is that the floss is removing something that brushing does not. Ask your dentist why you should floss and the answer is not removing occasional lodged pieces of food from between your teeth, but cleaning under the gum line. There is no evidence to suggest it works that way, this is what the long term studies have determined.
Re:Routine dental X-rays are not backed by evidence–experts ... by mikedelfino on Tuesday October 15, 2024 @12:48PM (#41850496)
So by that rationale, after a thorough brush, flossing would never remove anything?
Re:Routine dental X-rays are not backed by evidence–experts ... by svet_0 on Tuesday October 15, 2024 @04:11PM (#41852612)
plaque and food under gum line
Re:Routine dental X-rays are not backed by evidence–experts ... by bdjsiqoocwk on Tuesday October 15, 2024 @02:40AM (#41845628)
Cannot be proven to help if you don't mind your organic matter decomposing in your mouth.
Re:Routine dental X-rays are not backed by evidence–experts ... by rootusrootus on Tuesday October 15, 2024 @11:04AM (#41849368)
Presumably you brush your teeth. The studies on floss usage do not start with a baseline of doing nothing at all.