News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Germany's 49-euro ticket resulted in significant modal sh... by sadcherry on Saturday October 12, 2024 @04:16PM (#41822157)
Airtravel is also subsidised by the German tax payer. Much more than the 49 EUR ticket. No matter if you are a tourist or not. (Arguably mostly for tourists actually.)
Re:Germany's 49-euro ticket resulted in significant modal sh... by kristianp on Saturday October 12, 2024 @05:41PM (#41822923)
What's the method of subsidy there? Contributing to Airbus shares?
Re:Germany's 49-euro ticket resulted in significant modal sh... by echoangle on Saturday October 12, 2024 @06:15PM (#41823185)
Commercial aviation fuel is tax exempt in the EU, I would already count that as a subsidy (yes, I count not taxing something that's normally taxed as a subsidy, even if it isn't done by directly paying out money).
Re:Germany's 49-euro ticket resulted in significant modal sh... by Qwertious on Saturday October 12, 2024 @07:25PM (#41823651)
Subsidising airports and fuel, presumably.
Re:Germany's 49-euro ticket resulted in significant modal sh... by jacooper on Sunday October 13, 2024 @01:30PM (#41829821)
How is it subsidized while a local flight costs more than an international one?

The idea is to push people to use the train, but a train isn't an alternative if it takes 9 hours compared to the 2 hour flight.

Re:Germany's 49-euro ticket resulted in significant modal sh... by sadcherry on Monday October 14, 2024 @04:07PM (#41841367)
ICE from Hamburg to Munich is about 5 hours. That's basically the other end of the country. Not sure where 9 hours come from.

And your 2 hour flight easily goes to 4-5 hours if you add the security theatre and the extra overhead that transport to/from the airport entails. They are far outside the city whereas central stations are usually in the city center.