Re:Miqt: MIT-licensed Qt bindings for Go
by voidfunc on Wednesday October 09, 2024 @10:26AM
(#41788288)
Yea.. that sounds like a non-starter for use.
Re:Miqt: MIT-licensed Qt bindings for Go
by chipdart on Thursday October 10, 2024 @01:09AM
(#41795720)
> Yea.. that sounds like a non-starter for use.
I'd also wager that a FLOSS binding to a non-FLOSS framework with steep licensing fees would also kill this option for most.
What non-FLOSS framework do you mean? Qt Widgets is LGPL,
Re:Miqt: MIT-licensed Qt bindings for Go
by tomjen3 on Wednesday October 09, 2024 @10:53AM
(#41788547)
This sounds like something that was a good idea to begin with - we should ensure the libraries can be MIT licensed by using a separate binary, then hitting the "most likely go developers don't want to setup a complex C++ compile chain" to "I known we will just precompile it" to "oh but where can I download it from" to "oh I have that server".
Every step in the chain makes sense and is done with the best intention, but the result is, well.
Been there done that. Didn't get the t-shirt.
Re:Miqt: MIT-licensed Qt bindings for Go
by bitwize on Wednesday October 09, 2024 @01:09PM
(#41790203)
Reminds me of PS/Tk, a cross-platform, cross-implementation GUI library for Scheme that worked by opening a pipe to a Tcl/Tk process and communicating with that. It actually worked fairly well, though it's sadly abandoned now. I contributed somewhat by getting it working for Gambit.
Re:Miqt: MIT-licensed Qt bindings for Go
by hinkelman on Wednesday October 09, 2024 @04:50PM
(#41792461)
Do you mean that it was abandoned for Gambit? It's available for Chicken [1] and via Akku [2] for Chibi, Gauche, and Sagittarius.
WTF?