News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

hinkelman

Re:Miqt: MIT-licensed Qt bindings for Go on Wednesday October 09, 2024 @04:50PM (#41792461)
Do you mean that it was abandoned for Gambit? It's available for Chicken [1] and via Akku [2] for Chibi, Gauche, and Sagittarius.

[1] https://wiki.call-cc.org/eggref/5/pstk

[2] https://akkuscm.org/packages/(rebottled%20pstk)/

Re:Racket v7.5 on Friday November 22, 2019 @11:49PM (#21612540)
The project is now called Rhombus, not Racket2. A project plan was posted on the Racket mailing list about 6 weeks ago: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/racket-users/rhom...
R
Re:Future of Racket on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @12:02PM (#20635927)
This is a key line from his post:

"Also to be fair, if you have some mileage on your odometer, your pattern-recognition machinery will quickly assign high probabilities to various outcomes."

His combination of personality and experience is leading him to draw conclusions about where Racket2 is headed that is causing him to press pause on using (and contributing to) Racket. I had a similar reaction (described in this post: https://www.travishinkelman.com/post/exploring-scheme-implem...).

It seems that you are not assigning as high of probability to the outcomes that Greg is concerned about. Or you are not as concerned about those outcomes.

Re:Future of Racket on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @11:26AM (#20635572)
The legacy libraries and languages are maintained but not promoted. For example...

"Do not use #lang scheme to start new projects; #lang racket is the preferred language."

If #lang racket could go the way of #lang scheme, then it is harder for me to justify investing my time in #lang racket now.

Re:Future of Racket on Wednesday August 07, 2019 @11:16AM (#20635459)
He didn't rehash arguments that he had made on the Racket mailing list in his blog post. Here is one example: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/racket-users/vN_1uUJZn...