Re:Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock...
by whalesalad on Monday October 07, 2024 @03:43PM
(#41770130)
You are right that youtube is better but so much of that content is also biased towards sponsors. At least the good instructional content with high production value tends to be very heavy on sponsorships. The indie stuff can be great, but you are gonna have a 720p shaky camera with terrible lighting and lots of umms and backstories about why I am redoing my vintage farmhouse (a-la the recipe meme where every recipe page has a 32 paragraph preamble before the actual recipe)
Re:Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock...
by pavel_lishin on Monday October 07, 2024 @05:27PM
(#41771253)
For what it's worth, the last time I had a home improvement project I needed youtube help with, the one-and-a-half minute mumble-tronic video shot on a Nokia brick-phone was the most helpful one.
Would I have preferred a nice 1080p, shot in good lighting on a flat white table? Yes. But those also tend to be 30 minutes along, and as you said, with a sponsorship for HurfDurfVPN in the middle.
Re:Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock...
by carlosjobim on Monday October 07, 2024 @08:50PM
(#41772730)
Well why do you expect people to teach you for free how to do home improvement? Those people who know how to do it well are working with it and you can pay them to improve your home.
Re:Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock...
by Retr0id on Monday October 07, 2024 @05:36PM
(#41771323)
AI-generated youtube videos are here too, although they're fairly easy to spot for now. The general formula seems to be a bunch of stock images / AI-generated images / stock footage relevant to the video title, with a LLM-generated script read out by an elevenlabs-style voice.
Re:Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock...
by IAmNotACellist on Monday October 07, 2024 @05:42PM
(#41771370)
Gaining information from a video (often just someone talking into their phone) feels like sucking a milkshake through a coffee stirrer compared to reading a forum post written by a human. Worse, you can't see how deep that milkshake is at a glance, so you may end up with just a sip from a melted puddle vs. the big volume of content you wanted.
Re:Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock...
by dyauspitr on Monday October 07, 2024 @09:57PM
(#41773104)
That depends. For anything that involves learning how to do a physical movement, video is an infinitely more information dense medium to learn it through.
Re:Nearly all of the Google images results for "baby peacock...
by Eddy_Viscosity2 on Wednesday October 09, 2024 @04:32PM
(#41792315)
I would disagree, I've done a number of diy home improvement projects with decent (for dyi) results using mostly youtube. My old school washer and dryer have been saved repeatedly by following step-by-step youtube videos for fixes and part replacements.
I prefer text content to videos by a long shot, but genuine, human text content is almost dead. Reddit might be one of the rare exceptions for now. There are also random, still active, old school forums for lots of things but they tend to become extremely hard to find.